i think there might be a fake anonymous group

[taz1stP]

http://ca.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idCATRE8091E320120110
that doesn't sound like anonymous i have herd from.

[Rosie]

It only takes one idiot in a group to think that they have the authority to make a threat. Probally some nutjob who used there name to make his threat seem valid.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

...

this is my main problem with anon. they're ALL a bunch of idiots, and the whole "no accountability" bullshit is fucked up.

[Chikun]

Pffff, there's only a small amount of people in that group who know what they're doing, the rest are script-kiddies who think DDoS attacks are "hacking".

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

sometimes, when i think open source groups with a signified name to represent its movement do something over the top. I become skeptical and post threads or in this case, treads about the made believe topic i perceived after sniffing a gallon of paint thinner.

an anonymous person said anonymously that anonymous was anonymous about anonymous things. <---am i doing it right taz?

[StarsMine]

You just now relized there is a fake anon group?
Remeber lulzsec claiming to be anon. Anon has now become a scapegoat, whether or not the hacking group actually agrees with anons ideals or not. Deminizing the anon name to the public.