Constitutional Rights

[anex]

You don't need a bushmaster for hunting.
You don't need a 100 round magazine for hunting.
No one is trying to ban ALL guns.
I like hunting but I would not need 100 32 cal rounds to kill a dear.

^---- This. That is exactly what is being discussed. The only guns that anyone would be coming after is assault rifles. Why? Because assault rifles allow people who go on mass murder sprees to rack up their kills easier but people have been pushing that for a while. If you think you need an AR-15 to "hunt" or "protect yourself", then you shouldn't be owning guns in the first place.

[thecat]

anex for the win!

[-=Toy=-=Québec=-FR]

You don't need a bushmaster for hunting.
You don't need a 100 round magazine for hunting.
No one is trying to ban ALL guns.
I like hunting but I would not need 100 32 cal rounds to kill a dear.
You can't overthrow the US government with the weapons open to the public so don't pull the I need the guns to fight an abusive government crap.

Related ?

ffff.PNG

[Assassin]

Related ?

ffff.PNG

Lol dude he's obviously over 13..

[-=Toy=-=Québec=-FR]

Lol dude he's obviously over 13..

oh sorry *fail*

[ZERO]

Given the point of the right to be armed is to defend against a tyrannical government I think the real issue is that we do not have enough tank and artillery ownership.

[Rapedollar$]

Given the point of the right to be armed is to defend against a tyrannical government I think the real issue is that we do not have enough tank and artillery ownership.

true but in the event that we had to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government a portion of the current standing military would surely side with the constitutionalists.

i am however surprised how few people actually know the 2nd amendment isn't about keeping a hunting rifle.

[StarsMine]

... What in the hell of fuck.
Hell just froze over, Cat said something intelligent.

When the time comes to over throw the government just mod your guns and gun cartages to 100 round clips. We are a nation of DIYers and many mechanical engineers so that would be a non-problem. Until then for home use you should not need more then 6 bullets, when hunting you don't need anything more then bolt action.

Personally an assult rifile that is in semi automatic and has a normal/gimped clip is fine. I dont see much of a reason to ban those, a sawed off shotgun or an SMG is much better for close quarter massacre, and thats how its usually done when they happen.

[HotFuzz]

^---- This. That is exactly what is being discussed. The only guns that anyone would be coming after is assault rifles. Why? Because assault rifles allow people who go on mass murder sprees to rack up their kills easier but people have been pushing that for a while. If you think you need an AR-15 to "hunt" or "protect yourself", then you shouldn't be owning guns in the first place.

Think about this.... I just shot you with my .22 rifle.. guess what, thats an assault rifle too then huh? i just assaulted you with it. a weapon is a weapon and all firearms are deadly. the scope could be broadened to include just about anything.
marijuana, cocaine, meth, crack, pcp, ect ect are illegal too, hows that turning out?

and just because yes it seems like theres a lot of gun violence going on cause the media publicizes it so much doesnt mean shit. think about how many firearms are out there. its not like theres 10,000 firearms out there and 5,000 ppl are committing crimes with them.

[anex]

Oh lordy HotFuzz, you have made me seen the light. Guns for all! Keep that M249 just in case you need to defend yourself against that nigger Obama.