WCS themed Mafia Game

[CYBER]

cyber, if you slowed down even just a little you would realize that you are the only one pointing fingers at wolf.at this point based off gathered facts he is the least likely to be mafia.

Oh, i realize im the only one pointing fingers at wolf. I was the first to do so based on a faithful assumption that he voted no-lynch first. Then there were like 3-4 ppl pointing fingers at wolf? Suddenly, he posts a claim, a claim that he is most likely townie with a flame pred race. Some people see it as him showing townies some cards to vote better, personally i saw it as too convenient. And surely enough, im the only one still questioning wolf whereas others have gone fighting eachother. Note that i've yet to see any other wolf arguement (if i remember right) after people looked away from him...I'll be honest with smthn tho, i AM clinging to this vote. From what i read so far i dont see any behaviour that's able to make me vote for someone else, im stubburn on this. And the other option would be no-lynching... If the majority wants and the day is takin too long, thats the only reason why i'd vote a no-lynch, even when i dont agree with, simply bcos i'd assume that u guys see smthn i dont... But other than that? I cant see what would change my opinion about this.. I could be wrong or confused, but that's just how im seeing shit

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Oh, i realize im the only one pointing fingers at wolf. I was the first to do so based on a faithful assumption that he voted no-lynch first. Then there were like 3-4 ppl pointing fingers at wolf? Suddenly, he posts a claim, a claim that he is most likely townie with a flame pred race. Some people see it as him showing townies some cards to vote better, personally i saw it as too convenient. And surely enough, im the only one still questioning wolf whereas others have gone fighting eachother. Note that i've yet to see any other wolf arguement (if i remember right) after people looked away from him...I'll be honest with smthn tho, i AM clinging to this vote. From what i read so far i dont see any behaviour that's able to make me vote for someone else, im stubburn on this. And the other option would be no-lynching... If the majority wants and the day is takin too long, thats the only reason why i'd vote a no-lynch, even when i dont agree with, simply bcos i'd assume that u guys see smthn i dont... But other than that? I cant see what would change my opinion about this.. I could be wrong or confused, but that's just how im seeing shit

you may change your mind after you realize that your fundamental reason for choosing to stick with wolf, is wrong.





He announced his flame pred post AFTER everyone but yourself unvoted him.

By no means am i defending him but i have offered logical reasoning based on facts gathered so far that he is actually the least likely mafia member at this point in the game. Dont waste your vote because you are stubborn.

---------- Post added at 04:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------

i mean why would you vote for someone else, when the only other suspicious behavior that is being acknowledge by EVERYONE else happens to be the two people you sided with from the get go. What and locust.

[brett friggin favre]

and so cyber goes on my radar...

[Chikun]

Everyone is always on my radar.

[CYBER]

and so cyber goes on my radar...

are you fucking kidding me?
Mikey posts a random half-assed claim that im affiliated with locust and what without ANY proof at all (go ahead mikey, re-read the threads) and people already put a target on my back? ffs you guys are so gullible sometimes.

Mikey, I'm not affiliated with Locust or What, especially not locust. I don't know where you got that info from. And What, i only agree with him on one thing and one thing only: i don't like the no-lynch option.

re-check your info, then come back to me with more facts.


ps: I read through the votes again, wolf's still on my shit list, but no longer the first.
I'm unvoting him right now just because from my ula experience, if i get ANY shred of doubt , i cant vote on this.
Locust, im still waiting on an explanation as to why you're being so jumpy with the votes? (and don't use the "im new " excuse).
Because unless you convince me, you could be the next guy i vote off based on your actions only...
but for now:
UNVOTE.

[CYBER]

addition to my last post:
Tom told me "no lynching" is the worst thing u can do. Tom is objective in this because he's the moderator, if anything i should trust in what he says. Not to mention that he's played this game more than any of us.
What is seconding this, and that's the ONLY reason why i'd ever agree with What or anyone else at this current stage (with no info).

We're all claiming that on day 1, there's no info at all. But there's the ONE info: no-lynching is bad based on the moderator's input.
You have people advocating for it, people going against it. That's the only info we have.

(you can also "cheat" the game slightly because we have the full list of possible races in wcs, and their interpretation in this game, so we can make some educated guesses such as a BM, undead, void, flame pred, protector molecule? Hell , who would be a better Vigilante for the townies but your friendly neighborhood spider-man? ) But other than that and the educated posts made by mikey and others, that's all we have, so it's hard to side with anyone here, except on good faith...

ps: see how easy it is to type on a fucking laptop? Damn crappy piece of shit of an overexpensive iphone building brick!

[What]

I again urge those who voted no lynch to unvote. It is a terrible choice and give no benefit what so ever. You can't look at a vote to lynch someone based on ratios and percentages since that only comes into play if it is a TOTAL shot in the dark. That is not the situation we have here. If you keep voting no lynch, the mafia can just come in and pump it up to 8 votes, hence screwing us over. It is illogical and foolish to go with no lynch, we will on 100% certainly hinder ourselves by following that path. No good can come of it. A chance must be taken based on an educated guess to give us the best chance of survival.

[Locust]

I again urge those who voted no lynch to unvote. It is a terrible choice and give no benefit what so ever. You can't look at a vote to lynch someone based on ratios and percentages since that only comes into play if it is a TOTAL shot in the dark. That is not the situation we have here. If you keep voting no lynch, the mafia can just come in and pump it up to 8 votes, hence screwing us over. It is illogical and foolish to go with no lynch, we will on 100% certainly hinder ourselves by following that path. No good can come of it. A chance must be taken based on an educated guess to give us the best chance of survival.

It is a total shot in the dark. From what I see people suspect me, yet i know I'm not mafia. The shit you think you're basing your educated guess on is not necessarily good info. It really is a total shot in the dark

[Nemesis]

What, if you want a vote you need to provide evidence on who it is needs to be lynched, not just clammering for a vote constantly.

[CYBER]

you may change your mind after you realize that your fundamental reason for choosing to stick with wolf, is wrong. He announced his flame pred post AFTER everyone but yourself unvoted him.By no means am i defending him but i have offered logical reasoning based on facts gathered so far that he is actually the least likely mafia member at this point in the game. Dont waste your vote because you are stubborn.---------- Post added at 04:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------i mean why would you vote for someone else, when the only other suspicious behavior that is being acknowledge by EVERYONE else happens to be the two people you sided with from the get go. What and locust.

When in heaven's name did i side with locust??? If anything i was the first to say that "also, locust is suspicious because he immediately agreed to no-lynch", hell he's SECOND on my shit list. And why am i siding with What? I haven't sided with anyone. If u're referring to lynching someone? U cant say that im sided with him because it's literally a 50-50 vote to vote or not to vote. The filtering u're doing is too broad. Hell, even What is somewhat on my shit list, and so is nemesis, albeit not high ranked on it. If anything i've siding with YOU mostly because the What-nemesis debate's been giving me chills, and u seem to be the only one actually putting thought and effort into this. Oh and btw, from ur forums visited page thing? : scribble ula work, brett ula work, owns clan work/gw2 stalker lol, carm? I swear i dont even know why she's on my profile...probably to either send me a demo or stalking my mexican wall. Leave me alone! No but seriously, why are u on my wall carm? Oh and btw mikey, nice touch on the visitors thing, i was gonna do that myself and check for any posts or friend requests in ibis but i figured that if anything, they would be writing pms not writing on walls, not to mention that u dnt need to be friends to write eachother, so i sent the wrong way on thisPs: i didnt see that wolf posted his race AFTER ppl unvoted him... I probably read the thread backwards since it happens when i get recent posts by mail and then i have to trace the thread backwards to read everything beforehand... THIS is smthn that might change my mind about wolf... But im gonna need to have to go skim through the dreadful posts again to get a better decision...