Page 28 of 50 FirstFirst ... 18 26 27 28 29 30 38 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 512

Thread: Mafia Game: Monster Mash (Hosted by Sin and What)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Vote pass

    - - - Updated - - -

    also, all im going to say is.... blackmage, you have been awfully quiet since assassins slip. You were very vocal until that point.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Are you embarrassed about being wrong?
    Are you a town PR, backing off to mitagate the damage you caused?
    Are you mafia faction attempting to hide because you now have your primary roleblock target?
    Personal reform

  2. Default

    I find this hilarious. Mikey, you can't figure out why I'm suspicious of his Claim? Of course if he were the lesser werewolf he would claim town sided Power role but without saying which he was to avoid being countered. I just find that scummy as fuck, but I guess that is just me.
    What: my life skills use meat

    “Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed. ” -Mark Twain

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Passarelli View Post
    I find this hilarious. Mikey, you can't figure out why I'm suspicious of his Claim? Of course if he were the lesser werewolf he would claim town sided Power role but without saying which he was to avoid being countered. I just find that scummy as fuck, but I guess that is just me.
    Or perhaps if YOU were the lesser werewolf, you would claim "town side pr."
    What ifs are not a reason to lynch someone.
    I dont care how YOU would play a role.

    Phil is 1 of threee things.
    1. an anti town but not the anti town we are looking for.
    2. a vannila tonie, making a bad play.
    3. a town pr who just lost us the game.

    - - - Updated - - -

    and to be even more clear.

    You are determined to lynch phil. Why phil and why now? Perhaps it is because there is a wagon. Further evidence substantiates my hypothesis. You were in fact the last person to vote for phil. Thus putting him at L-2.

    - - - Updated - - -

    To be entierly honest... i dont expect people to actually read the thread. If they do, who we vote is pretty clear.
    Personal reform

  4. Default

    The reason I haven't said anything is twofold. First, given certain parties decided to make the town's job much more dificult, in contrast to a plan I laid out, obviously my input wasn't required. Second, I was waiting to see how long it would take for ANYONE to mention I hadn't said a single word. Only took about 9 and a half days. I'll let you live in your delusional world and admit to anything you care to say if it so helps your ego. Sadly, you just can't seem to get it into your thick skull that sometimes dead horses should lie unbeaten, and that you can't actually change history.

    If you want me to say something, here's you go. Phil made a claim, but has not fully claimed. Pass keeps suggesting he should cement the claim so "someone could CC". The only problem there is, unless we think Phil is the head WW, that's probably the worst move we have left to us. Related to that, clearing Phil because of no CC would be just as bad.

    There are 5 roles Phil could be. If he's the head WW, he's doing a huge gamble. I strongly doubt he's the head WW, but if we think he is, we should just lynch him and win. This is the only case we want to push for a CC. If he's the minor WW, with what Pass is suggesting is, either he's cleared because the real PR doesn't CC, or else he IS CC'd, and we go to the CC case. If he's the minor vamp, while, yes, he's trying to clear himself, what he's also doing is helping the town. At night, if the WWs convert him, both of our PRs are still around, and they didn't mess with the masons. If he's the head Vamp, he does the above, only moreso, because it means he won't be converted. As a vamp, if he's CC'd, we CAN'T hit a werewolf, AND we out a PR to the WWs. If he's actually a PR, he can still be CC'd by a WW, and we may have to look at a CC case anyway.

    If he DOES get CC'd, we have to decide if who is telling the truth. A failure means they have an extra kill AND an extra night. Success means kill something and STILL lose a PR.

    Either we want to lynch him, or not. As I see it, we DON'T want a CC. Pass, maybe I'm missing something, but why are you pushing for him to possibly be CC'd?

    Side note, Mikey, Ass, you might want to decide what to do with the faith healer. If you ARE planning on shooting someone, you want to find a way to NOT have the healer protect that person.
    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO
    Your aim will be somewhat impacted although testing showed this to have minimal impact on ability to kill stuff b/c you all suck at aiming anyways.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackmage View Post
    The reason I haven't said anything is twofold. First, given certain parties decided to make the town's job much more dificult, in contrast to a plan I laid out, obviously my input wasn't required. Second, I was waiting to see how long it would take for ANYONE to mention I hadn't said a single word. Only took about 9 and a half days. I'll let you live in your delusional world and admit to anything you care to say if it so helps your ego. Sadly, you just can't seem to get it into your thick skull that sometimes dead horses should lie unbeaten, and that you can't actually change history.

    If you want me to say something, here's you go. Phil made a claim, but has not fully claimed. Pass keeps suggesting he should cement the claim so "someone could CC". The only problem there is, unless we think Phil is the head WW, that's probably the worst move we have left to us. Related to that, clearing Phil because of no CC would be just as bad.

    There are 5 roles Phil could be. If he's the head WW, he's doing a huge gamble. I strongly doubt he's the head WW, but if we think he is, we should just lynch him and win. This is the only case we want to push for a CC. If he's the minor WW, with what Pass is suggesting is, either he's cleared because the real PR doesn't CC, or else he IS CC'd, and we go to the CC case. If he's the minor vamp, while, yes, he's trying to clear himself, what he's also doing is helping the town. At night, if the WWs convert him, both of our PRs are still around, and they didn't mess with the masons. If he's the head Vamp, he does the above, only moreso, because it means he won't be converted. As a vamp, if he's CC'd, we CAN'T hit a werewolf, AND we out a PR to the WWs. If he's actually a PR, he can still be CC'd by a WW, and we may have to look at a CC case anyway.

    If he DOES get CC'd, we have to decide if who is telling the truth. A failure means they have an extra kill AND an extra night. Success means kill something and STILL lose a PR.

    Either we want to lynch him, or not. As I see it, we DON'T want a CC. Pass, maybe I'm missing something, but why are you pushing for him to possibly be CC'd?

    Side note, Mikey, Ass, you might want to decide what to do with the faith healer. If you ARE planning on shooting someone, you want to find a way to NOT have the healer protect that person.
    problem is, most of your post is irrelevant. Worrying about mafia or sufficing for mafia is bad. If and when all werewolfs are dead, its an auto win for town. Provided at least 3 town power roles are alive.
    secondly, i noted you being afk, i noted your inaction to my phil vote, im aware. My observation of you hasnt changed since your attack on me. I still believe you to be mafia, however, mafia lynches are not the towns goal.
    I want to be as clear as i can, YOU provoked me. YOU attacked me. Over something as trivial as an opinion you misunderstood. It is over kid, stop digging up graves.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ_MikeyRevile View Post
    problem is, most of your post is irrelevant. Worrying about mafia or sufficing for mafia is bad. If and when all werewolfs are dead, its an auto win for town. Provided at least 3 town power roles are alive.
    secondly, i noted you being afk, i noted your inaction to my phil vote, im aware. My observation of you hasnt changed since your attack on me. I still believe you to be mafia, however, mafia lynches are not the towns goal.
    I want to be as clear as i can, YOU provoked me. YOU attacked me. Over something as trivial as an opinion you misunderstood. It is over kid, stop digging up graves.
    yo better explain how its an auto win.

    If all werewolfs are dead (the result of lynching the alpha) that means 2 mafia remain. In the event the alpha is lynched, it gives all remaining power roles the ability to hard claim safely. Doing to limits the poll to lynch or vig kill from. After that is accomplished, town can either lynch the remainder and/or let vig kill. Process of elimination.

    Secondly and probually the biggest... i feel like a majority of you who are fighting, including blackmage, are neglecting the fact that mafia cant be caught by the seer. As the seer only detects werewolf's.

    - - - Updated - - -

    pre intowxicated, i apologize for any broken english.

    - - - Updated - - -

    furthermore @ seer. Ignore the simple fact that your investigative results could end up being the person who get turned. The goal for town is to find and lynch the alpha. If you get a result saying non werewolf and they end up getting turned, or a thought crosses your mind about whether or not they were turned, ignore it and use process of elimination. The people who are potential targets for turns are not the alpha, there for, do not worry about them.

    - - - Updated - - -

    also, blackmage. I will say it now and personally tell assassin, not to kill tonight.
    Personal reform

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackmage View Post
    If you want me to say something, here's you go. Phil made a claim, but has not fully claimed. Pass keeps suggesting he should cement the claim so "someone could CC". The only problem there is, unless we think Phil is the head WW, that's probably the worst move we have left to us. Related to that, clearing Phil because of no CC would be just as bad.

    There are 5 roles Phil could be. If he's the head WW, he's doing a huge gamble. I strongly doubt he's the head WW, but if we think he is, we should just lynch him and win. This is the only case we want to push for a CC. If he's the minor WW, with what Pass is suggesting is, either he's cleared because the real PR doesn't CC, or else he IS CC'd, and we go to the CC case. If he's the minor vamp, while, yes, he's trying to clear himself, what he's also doing is helping the town. At night, if the WWs convert him, both of our PRs are still around, and they didn't mess with the masons. If he's the head Vamp, he does the above, only moreso, because it means he won't be converted. As a vamp, if he's CC'd, we CAN'T hit a werewolf, AND we out a PR to the WWs. If he's actually a PR, he can still be CC'd by a WW, and we may have to look at a CC case anyway.

    If he DOES get CC'd, we have to decide if who is telling the truth. A failure means they have an extra kill AND an extra night. Success means kill something and STILL lose a PR.

    Either we want to lynch him, or not. As I see it, we DON'T want a CC. Pass, maybe I'm missing something, but why are you pushing for him to possibly be CC'd?
    Reading the rest but then I have to head out. Thank you for actually showing some reasoning why Phil hard claiming could be a bad idea. I had only asked around 5 times.

    Unvote

    Mikey, you still don't see why I don't trust Phil's post? A lot of it has to do with 2/3 wagons day 1 hitting power roles. I also encourage you to please reread my recent posts--I thought I laid out the scenario fairly well.
    What: my life skills use meat

    “Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed. ” -Mark Twain

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Passarelli View Post
    Reading the rest but then I have to head out. Thank you for actually showing some reasoning why Phil hard claiming could be a bad idea. I had only asked around 5 times.

    Unvote

    Mikey, you still don't see why I don't trust Phil's post? A lot of it has to do with 2/3 wagons day 1 hitting power roles. I also encourage you to please reread my recent posts--I thought I laid out the scenario fairly well.

    Why unvote? I agree that the chances we hit 2 power roles is unlikely. Phil claiming town power so early is really scummy and you know he isnt going to hard claim because then he would get cc'd

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Passarelli View Post
    Reading the rest but then I have to head out. Thank you for actually showing some reasoning why Phil hard claiming could be a bad idea. I had only asked around 5 times.

    Unvote

    Mikey, you still don't see why I don't trust Phil's post? A lot of it has to do with 2/3 wagons day 1 hitting power roles. I also encourage you to please reread my recent posts--I thought I laid out the scenario fairly well.
    i never said i did not understand and if you look back, i had voted for him long before the rest of you. I do not disagree with your assessment either.
    unvote
    Personal reform

  9. Default

    Vote Pass

    beCAUSE

    - - - Updated - - -

    You wanted Phil to CC SO BAD, and just because someone says that it's not a good idea, you change your mind 180 just like that huh?
    I think you were being really stubborn to get him to CC, but after realizing how bad it looks, you changed your mind.

    We must free the WW of their curse before they spread it.








    LOL

    - - - Updated - - -

    You wanted Phil to CLAIM*

    Damnit..

    - - - Updated - - -

    I think it may be a full moon soon....

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minjae View Post
    I think it may be a full moon soon....
    Wtf? Was that a soft claim?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •