Stars: You never said there was not a rod in play, you defend Sin, saying that he indeed did receive fruit, that does not imply he was not a rod in any way.

Pass: I press you when you mentioned having info that would prove there was not a rod without saying what that was. Same as Scribble said, you are not going to be taken at your word, you need to elaborate. I didn't push for a role claim or even what that information may have exactly been, just what would lead you into that direction. I still do not believe what you have said, since usually when an action is performed you do not get name confirmation, and Blade is unlikely to make that kind of a slip up.

This is how I read what you did. You targeted, for example, Nemesis. You get a message back: Result: He was fully satisfied. You ask Blade, did I target Nemesis last night or someone else? He says, you targeted Nemesis. That does not mean that the action was actually performed on Nemesis, just that your intended target was in fact nemesis. The way you wrote your initial response to this question was all about who you targeted, the wording of which supports my contention about the information you actually got.

- - - Updated - - -

And I hate to keep bringing this up, I was the one against the idea of rod at the very beginning. It became a popular notion with most people, the implications of which would mean there would have been no useable info from last night, so it was important to confirm that this was not the situation before people start revealing what, if any info, they may have gathered during the night.