The Fox ibis.a 4/7/2016

[SCRIBBLE]

I should have prefaced that my post was not directed at any individual but the general population.

You're right, we don't need a second opinion, we trust the ULAs we choose to review demos and make decisions. While it isn't necessary, it is not a bad thing that I see you double checking the OP's proof. Despite how pointless it may seem, even ULAs are expected to review the demo before voting on a thread, despite how obvious the OP makes it out to be and what level that admin may be. When the ULA post a thread for an upside down aimbot and close it for obvious reasons, they are doing that on good faith. If the player posts an unban thread, then the clan intervenes.

[CYBER]

I should have prefaced that my post was not directed at any individual but the general population.

You're right, we don't need a second opinion, we trust the ULAs we choose to review demos and make decisions. While it isn't necessary, it is not a bad thing that I see you double checking the OP's proof. .

basically this.

while the ULAs have been veterans enough, and vetted enough to take care of the bans themselves (with oversight on severely hard cases if there aren't enough ulas who havent voted yet to run throughthe demos twice), it shows that you are putting in effort when you post your opinion.

While i agree that upside down aimbots dont need vetting, they usually get locked immediately anyway.
otherwise, feel free to post!