KonVert

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

lol, poor Mikeyrevile, 1 small portion of a clip is of me (konnn), the rest is of Konvert. The focus was on recording Konvert, he just started recording after death and it was on me. Eventually it switched to Konvert and it cought his hacks.

all im trying to say is there is something strange about all of this.

why out of the blue do you come and post so strongly about someone who just started playing in the server?

did you watch all the demos? you stated a few posts ago that you didnt. this is also the first time you seem so persistent on keeping someone banned when it isnt even up to you. Not to mention you bring up the fact that you arnt a hacker in a thread not even about you. so what if his screen is shacking, it didnt seem to be helping him at all in any of those 6 demos.

he needs to be unbanned. Not necessarily because i feel there is a lack of proof but because zero CLEARLY stated that no one is to be perma banned from the WCS server until the demos are reviewed in the ban request section of our forums.

[Deathrow]

Question/Answer Session! Weeee!

"why out of the blue do you come and post so strongly about someone who just started playing in the server?"

- He was excessively rude to me on multiple occasions, so I will send his info into www.steambans.com/ personally... This has nothing to do with IBIS's ban.

"Did I watch all the demos?"

- Yes

"you stated a few posts ago that you didnt"

- (Stated by me on Thursday, Jan. 20, 2011 at 01:26 PM) "How bout this... I'll watch it again for shit and giggles, because I want to just indulge myself a bit more. Btw, if not sent to www.steambans.com/, I will do it myself. Since I do have the proof downloaded on my computer."

"this is also the first time you seem so persistent on keeping someone banned when it isnt even up to you" (error or assumption made by you)

- I never stated that I wanted to keep Konvent banned, I merely stated that I think he should be banned. I know that I have no control over this process, but I can send him into steambans myself...

"fact that you arnt a hacker in a thread not even about you"

- True, can't fight that. No need for information like that... thats personal feelings and has nothing to do with the matters at hand.

"he needs to be unbanned. Not necessarily because i feel there is a lack of proof but because zero CLEARLY stated that no one is to be perma banned from the WCS server until the demos are reviewed in the ban request section of our forums."

- Ok... Anyway you look at it, he will still be banned from CSS all together. So your point is??? Btw, I would keep this forum up w/demos and let Zero review it. At his own leasure of course. I'm pretty sure he would ban the Konvent.
___________

PS. If you read that last sentence/paragraph. I said, "I would keep this forum up". This isn't stating, "Keep the forum up".

"I" think this forum has useful demos and should be reported on multipul levels.

Thank You DJ_MikeyRevile, for showing interests in my post on this forum topic. By you stating things about it, I know you took the time to read it

[konvert]

Well guys u think what u think of me i dont hack thats for sure otherwise i wouldnt have a score of 11-17 but more something like 20-0 right and i wouldnt be able to play on VAC-servers would i ? think about that for a second u filmed me one time it could of been because of my high latency i have all the time , why would i even bother hacking. And why would i do it on a server i enjoy playing on and DO NOT want to get banned on well i just wanted to say that kthx.

[h4x0r]

Thanks for letting me know about the rules mikey, I will be sure to do temp in the future until demos are reviewed.

[ZERO]

This appears as blatant no recoil hacks. They are poorly configured but they are hacks none the less. The perma ban shall be upheld, unless a bunch of admins or clan members believe that I have made a mistake here.

You can see how his screen shakes only when shooting. The shacking is meant to form as no recoil however in this hackers case was poorly configured. Normally hackers minimize the shacking to reduce detection.