STEAM_0:1:4019105 [Den]

[alex_mamaroneck]

Player: Den
steam id: STEAM_0:1:4019105
Reason: wallhacks and possible no recoil
i banned him for a week and let him know was was going on about the review process before banning him.

few things before the demo, it apears judging by his steam profile.. he just started playing CSS. His Steam id seems to be completely whited out. No history other then our server and SNK and there ban on him. Any thing you can find on him post here.

The Demos

The first demo is what i felt was the most obvious of wall hacks.
the rest you will notice that he starts to look at an enemy threw a wall then quickly pulls away as if trying not to target threw the walls. but he will snap to his teamates threw the walls no problem.

the most convincing evidence i have is in the demo den152145
He is hiding in some back room you see a guy approuch (when using wirefram) he disapears then den snaps around and kills him. There was no possible way den could have known he teleported with out being able to see threw that wall and notice he had done so. I would also like to ask about the very last kill on this demo. He seems to miss alot of the first shows on the guy crouching but then he like glitchs and all his shots shoot stright as an arrow.

Please try to review all demos in wireframe, without it and at slow speed.
if you cant review all the demos the first one like i said is the most convincing.

sorry mike, didn't have time to watch the videos, but i do have a couple of questions:

are we able to permaban if we have a demo but still not sure if he is really hacking? i mean we can leave him permabanned untill its confirmed he was hacking. or is zero able to ban him even if he's not online?

[maynard]

sorry mike, didn't have time to watch the videos, but i do have a couple of questions:

are we able to permaban if we have a demo but still not sure if he is really hacking? i mean we can leave him permabanned untill its confirmed he was hacking. or is zero able to ban him even if he's not online?

on WCS the answer is no. unless the person is so obviously hacking that you would have 2 be blind 2 not see it, perma bans are NOT allowed.

ill be checking out these vids this evening.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

sorry mike, didn't have time to watch the videos, but i do have a couple of questions:

are we able to permaban if we have a demo but still not sure if he is really hacking? i mean we can leave him permabanned untill its confirmed he was hacking. or is zero able to ban him even if he's not online?

Like maynard said, no. In this particular case i informed him in the server after i acquired my demos that i was banning him for a week and then explained to him the review process's telling him that if it is concluded that my demos are not sufficient he will be unbanned before the week is up.

[maynard]

here's the process

if you believe someone is hacking - ban them temp, put up a ban request.

if someone is beyond obviously hacking - perma ban them, post the demo in bans

if you think somoene might be hacking but are not sure - leave them alone till more opinions are offerd on the person in question.