Simple, they will just declare all torrent traffic is a violation.
Most smaller ISP's route their traffic through a larger ISP's "pipes". Trust me, you will be affected one way or another.
I read about this a month ago. Expected them to go through with it. No surprise to me. As Zero pretty much summed up, it's more of a bandwidth / money issue for the ISP than copyright infringement "education".
Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.
maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones
Their claim from the first link in the artical (the sixstrikes PDF)
That 35$ to clear your name is also pure bullshit19. Isn’t this just about ISPs trying to reduce online traffic?
• No. The fastest-growing segment of web traffic is legal online content that
subscribers will be encouraged to use. Access to lawful content services is
expanding rapidly, and ISPs are seeing more households add broadband service
and TV service at the same time. According to Nielsen, the number of
households with both a broadband connection and a home television subscription
increased in the last year from 61% to 66% of households.
I was reading up on this. So technically there's no fine or jail time. It's basically just getting the ISP's to annoy the fuck out of you with alerts/popups/redirects warning you.
Technically it isn't THAT bad, but I just see this as a stepping stone. You get the framework built to monitor everything, talk the ISP's into it easily because they won't be "penalizing" their customers, just warning them. The ISP's say "ok it's not that bad" and agree.
THEN the RIAA gets congress to allow them to use the already built framework to financially penalize people.
Step 1.. collect underpants
Step 2...
Step 3.. MAKE MONEY!