View Poll Results: Forced Auto-Assign?

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes!

    8 42.11%
  • No!!

    11 57.89%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: [SUGGESTION] Auto Assign

  1. Default

    Removing the level cap will not alter the gameplay in any major way, some may be more worried about race whores, but that already happens so its not an issue, plus if you a level 90 shadow hunter or something, when you get killed by a new player your gonna shoot out a bunch of xp. That is one thing i noticed, if im a maxed shadow hunter and kill a level 40 vaga, i get around 100 xp, but if they kill me they only get 30. But overall i have a crap load more xp on my shadowhunter than a level 40 vaga, so in a way it would even out xp distribution, or maybe im just insane.
    I hit Brett right in the feels.

  2. Default

    Let me restate my opinion.

    I want to keep the level cap for the sanctity of the war3rank (because it's the most important thing). What would be better, is to have a better record of how much xp each race has and to grant xp rewards for kills based on the other person's xp he or she has rather than the level. This way, when the person who whores his level 40 human constantly is killed by someone who just hit 40 with theirs, their xp gain would be more than just 30 based on the difference between the two. I find it silly to think that someone deserves a higher rank than someone because they only play one race very well without even needing to play any other. I think this would also add another level of skill as it would be easier to climb the xp ranks by getting kills with races you don't normally would play because they have a lower total amount of xp than others.

    How any of this is related to auto assign is enough insanity for one thread.

    Tastes like your moms kisses.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chikun View Post
    Let me restate my opinion.

    I want to keep the level cap for the sanctity of the war3rank (because it's the most important thing). What would be better, is to have a better record of how much xp each race has and to grant xp rewards for kills based on the other person's xp he or she has rather than the level. This way, when the person who whores his level 40 human constantly is killed by someone who just hit 40 with theirs, their xp gain would be more than just 30 based on the difference between the two. I find it silly to think that someone deserves a higher rank than someone because they only play one race very well without even needing to play any other. I think this would also add another level of skill as it would be easier to climb the xp ranks by getting kills with races you don't normally would play because they have a lower total amount of xp than others.

    How any of this is related to auto assign is enough insanity for one thread.
    Your obviously the only person concerned with war3rank as shown by your posts.

  4. Default

    Sarcasm is very hard to project.

    Tastes like your moms kisses.

  5. Default

    the rank helps determine your team placement for wcs scrims. i started sucking, they put me on spasm's team, presto win-o. war3rank is certainly the most important thing about wcs, but it's important in that if you do bad, you get to be on spasm's team.

    Through the darkness of futures past,
    The magician longs to see
    One chants out between two worlds:
    Fire, walk with me.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brett friggin favre View Post
    the rank helps determine your team placement for wcs scrims. i started sucking, they put me on spasm's team, presto win-o. war3rank is certainly the most important thing about wcs, but it's important in that if you do bad, you get to be on spasm's team.
    MVP of last scrim goes to r@mbo (I believe) all those free wpns, FUCK YEA

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obez View Post
    Do you guys think we could try out forced auto-assign? We were talking about it in the server and thought that maybe, if it was given a try, that it would help out from the major team stack (Where the best players don't go against eachother, but with and rape the other team). Also, would stop people from sitting in spec to try and get a team they want. I'm open to feedback so post what you guys think.
    I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dishes View Post
    I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?
    Interesting idea. Not sure its needed, but, interesting nonetheless.

    If you were a beautiful sound in the echos all around, I'd be your harmony.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dishes View Post
    I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?
    You're alright kid. You're alright.
    Then again my standards got squashed recently with TheCat's appearance in the threads...
    I second what owns said, to the letter.
    Started from bottom. Now we here. <IBIS>


    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Trying to hack in IBIS is like trying to kill someone in a police station, not the best idea...

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dishes View Post
    I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?
    +1, it would be nice to have the option to scramble teams even if it isn't needed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •