1- Don't fuck with the polls. Always show a clear YES or NO vote. My vote in blue above is a NO, not a subtle yes like you wrote it out to be.

2- I don't see any hacks at all in this demo. So as a second ULA voting, he'll be unbanned based on this demo alone.

3- you sent us the sourceban link to ALL The demos. What you need to do is go to that main sourceban page, search for the steam id of the "said" hacker, and copy us the link in THAT url, not all the bans. (just for nxt time.)
like this : http://www.ibisgaming.com/sourcebans...977487&Submit=

4- When ULAs vote a NO on the ban, we are not saying that there's no way he could be hacking.
We are saying that he either wasn't hacking in this demo, or that there was no conclusive proof that he was hacking in THIS demo. Feel free to keep watching the guy if you believe he hacks, that's your own call.
(it actually worked out many times that the banning admin gets another chance at a ban and wins it with a good demo.)

Brett, there were a FEW weird traces through walls btw, but that's what they were, weird accidental traces. Seeing as this map is overplayed a LOT, i'm attributing it to that.

But at some ticks he accidentally would fix his crosshair on teammates or enemies through the wall halfway accross the map... but again, when no action is being taken following such "moving traces" it's hard to tell if they were walls or coincidental traces we've seen many many many times before, even on our OWN demos

(we test the legitimacy of such moments by watching our demos to keep us fresh and I can't tell you how many times Brett and I said that "if i didn't know that was me, i'd be questioning my own coincidental traces on these overplayed maps like deagle." , ya dig?).

Better luck next time though, just keep your eyes peeled.

2 ULA votes for NO.
Unbanned. closed.