Quote Originally Posted by What View Post

At Nem:
No Lynch is a retard move. Sure its a gamble, but the risk does not outweigh the reward. On day two we will have no more information and now be down an additional person. You know as well as anybody that the no lynch in the last game is what fucked you guys over since you had no more information than the previous day and were paralyzed with indecision. Your continued support of it despite how intelligent you come off as indicates to me and to others that you are trying to subtly bait us into lynching you, which you would only do if you were mafia and had some sort of death ability that will take out some members of the town.
How would we be down an additional person? Honestly, in the grand scheme of Math, how is 1 bigger than 2? How is being down two people better than being down 1? The Red Wings played last night, when they took a slashing penalty did they say, "You know what? could you make it a 5 on 3 instead? we'd much rather be down two guys than one. It's clearly the right choice."

the reason we lost last game was because you got extremely lucky; I already knew scribble was one mafia, I didn't know the other. If you would have killed someone else Scribble would have been lynched the second day and it was only a matter of time until you. Lynching with no information is stupid, but please keep supporting that theory, because you're providing plenty.