Quote Originally Posted by Carmichal View Post
I was rereading and realized nem made a very good point bout cyber. He seem to be the first one to raise suspicion about someone with little proof but tried to pass it off as logical. Mexicans lac logic.

Unvote: ???whoever i was drunk..


Vote cyber
-.-
are u fucking kidding me? you know how long ago that shit was???
Nemesis thought I was talking about a serial killer when i was talking about a vigilante killer. We were clashing heads (him wanting to no-lynch, and me wanting to leach the most suspicious character AT THE TIME) whereas we were actually fucking AGREEING on the same subject... I didn't lie, he just didn't get what i said because of poor choice of wording... Thats the only reason he called me a liar.

Not to mention that I did think that What, AND tom told us that no-lynching is bad. And because what kept pushing for lynching, i thought my memory of such post by what antagonizing our previous gameplay existed. As for nem, i don't recall atm, but i THINK he also mentioned that no-lynching was bad last time but i cant be sure, or it could be a private conversation with someone about nemesis between gameplay? i don't know, i honestly don't know. But that was what happened, i didn't lie, i just got my facts wrong. And nemesis and What (even mikey) corrected me, especially regarding the races, because I was going wrong about this.


I was the only one that stuck to his guns on lynching wolf because he was the first to want to no-lynch, and he was suspicious when he "claimed" his flame pred race just before getting lynched.... or so i thought, mikey told me that he actually got unvoted BEFORE he claimed his race...
I was going under the assumption that he claimed flame pred to get ppl to back off of him,,, which was too convenient, but i was wrong and i didn't pay attention. Locust would have been my next choice because IF i assume that wolf is townie, then he baited a mafia, and he fell for it.
That's when i unvoted because i realized wolf might not be what i thought ,especially when i contemplated setting a vote-trap for the last voter to see who's eager to vote... but realized i'd be seen as a troublemaker instead of "trapping" someone...Thats when i realized what wolf might have done,,, so i backed off... as i stand right now, i don't have a vote... I'm leaning towards voting no-lynch because that seems to be the only thing people are advocating for... Vote for someone else and we enter another inner debate of trying to convince that person that is wrong...
Bottom line, i personally think that we're blowing this out of proportion BECAUSE there's only a handful of us even active... We're over thinking affiliations when there's almost an entire legion of players that haven't even discussed shit through yet...

For all we know , the mafia hasnt even voted yet, and they're having a laugh watching us strangle each other on presumptions... When i was mafia with you we did the same thing, we kept aside and waited for people to lynch eachother... That's not the case... i'm not neutral, but im not voting either... im making up my mind, and im sure it's not wolf anymore because i actually LEARNED smthn from all this fiasco that happened.

You, however, went afk for too long, noticed that people are going for a no-lynch, decided to go back (what? 5 pages back?) and find ANY post that could frame someone susceptible of causing a ban-wagon, you found me , and said "oh yeah, cyber! he should be mafia, what would stir up people even more than a mexican mafia? so what if the facts im using are wrong and outdated!" -.-...
It was either THIS logic that happened? or you simply aren't paying attention to what happened with my confusion shit at all ...