Originally Posted by
acolyte_to_jippity
testimonies from random people don't mean anything.
for the last time, all our bans go through a review process. if it is determined that the original admin made a mistake, googledeath will be unbanned. if it turns out that he was hacking, he'll be banned.
the system is quite fair, and in order to keep it that way, we don't allow outside testimony. "character witnesses" are not taken into consideration. do you think this is the first time we've had someone accused of hacking blame their "brother" for it? or that this is the first time one of their friends came on to tell us that we're wrong? it means nothing, and only serves to antagonize the people who are in charge of determining the ban's fate.
sit back, chill out, and quit fighting.
oh, and the reason other WCS's are more populated is because they tend to be much larger (40 slots, ew), or have a fuckton of imbalanced races (400 races!!! ew.) ibis prides itself with having a completely balanced, high-quality server, just like we did before the orange box update. problem admins are dealt with swiftly, but considering how in this case, the banning admin has followed all proper procedures to the letter, you have zero room to be calling him bullshit. this kind of crap isn't well likes around here mate. chill out, and game on.
google, you should sit down, look at any provided tick marks, and come up with a good explaination for them. telling us we're wrong won't do anything, unless you support it with evidence and explainations for every single issue we find against you. the fact that there have been 0 votes on this means that people are annoyed at your attitude and this bickering.
Register To Reply
