SSD Time?

[ZERO]

Only a time machine or removal of LUA code will solve that.

[brett friggin favre]

Only a time machine or removal of LUA code will solve that.

and we're discussing...a fucking SSD?

shit zero, quit slacking and think big. time machine or bust, c'mon man.

[Chikun]

Only a time machine or removal of LUA code will solve that.

Then why do other NS2 servers run fine without constant rubberbanding?

[i2o4]

Is this why the WCS server seems to be a bit laggy today? Or is it just me? D:

[jwtemp]

It's why all servers seem laggy. They all reside on the same box, so the NS2 server being naughty wreaks havoc across the board.

Zero, how many drives will you require and what's the approximate cost of each? I know what typical SSDs are running these days but have no idea what the server grade models are going for.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

It's why all servers seem laggy. They all reside on the same box, so the NS2 server being naughty wreaks havoc across the board.

Zero, how many drives will you require and what's the approximate cost of each? I know what typical SSDs are running these days but have no idea what the server grade models are going for.

no, i'm pretty sure WCS is on a different box.

[jwtemp]

The totally stupidly crazy IO load from the NS2 servers during map changes is creating some issues for all the servers on the box.

I read this as all IBIS servers are running on one box. If they weren't, why would one's performance/resource consumption affect any of the others? Unless it was bandwidth or SAN related, and I don't think ZERO's running a SAN, it wouldn't.

[Locust]

"all the servers on the box."

that just means that some of the servers share the same box. not that all the servers are on the one.