Supernatural Mafia

[CYBER]

to my note about the voters, i meant that the forced hammerer, if any, is not in the remaining non-voters...

also i forgot to answer at Sin's quote...

I agree with what sin is saying here... bussing what we believe is a VT to death when we know we could be finding better targets or scummy behaviour...



Like brett, you told Nemesis before that "there you are nemesis, your shit stinks, but someone else's shit stinks even more..." ... and when YOU believe that stan is a VT, you keep going for a vote on stan instead of following up with what u accused nemesis of doing over and over again?
wth man... i could use an explanation if u dont mind

- - - Updated - - -

i'm glad we got irish out of last game. his actions proved he was useless, as have stan's. if you can't so much as read the rules...why are you here? i see him as a hazard as much as possible help, he could easily throw in a vote backing mafia without knowing it.

ok sry i kinda posted while u posted...


i see what you mean about him possibly being a hassle... but not yet. unless the MAJORITY of townies went full tard, his vote wont be so influencial at the start. but might be later on , especially if mafia will very like not be focusing on stan at this point... for the same reasons Sin isn't a priority either i believe... so us killing him off so fast, albeit a reasonable sacrifice in case he fucks up later, still isn't a priority right now as opposed to keep pressing on the people who STILL STINK if u know what i mean.

if we hit a dead end there... THEN we can sacrifice stan as a VERY last resort,,, almost as how NL is a very last resort.

[brett friggin favre]

to my note about the voters, i meant that the forced hammerer, if any, is not in the remaining non-voters...

also i forgot to answer at Sin's quote...

I agree with what sin is saying here... bussing what we believe is a VT to death when we know we could be finding better targets or scummy behaviour...



Like brett, you told Nemesis before that "there you are nemesis, your shit stinks, but someone else's shit stinks even more..." ... and when YOU believe that stan is a VT, you keep going for a vote on stan instead of following up with what u accused nemesis of doing over and over again?
wth man... i could use an explanation if u dont mind

- - - Updated - - -


ok sry i kinda posted while u posted...


i see what you mean about him possibly being a hassle... but not yet. unless the MAJORITY of townies went full tard, his vote wont be so influencial at the start. but might be later on , especially if mafia will very like not be focusing on stan at this point... for the same reasons Sin isn't a priority either i believe... so us killing him off so fast, albeit a reasonable sacrifice in case he fucks up later, still isn't a priority right now as opposed to keep pressing on the people who STILL STINK if u know what i mean.

if we hit a dead end there... THEN we can sacrifice stan as a VERY last resort,,, almost as how NL is a very last resort.

we saw last game that nem despite playing scummy as fuck, was town-sided, and a power role as well. for that, he's stupid. his input can be valuable though. i can't trust nem's play to mean that he's scum, and his input is more valuable than stan's. he's right up there on my list, but i'll give him a night at least and see what he brings to the table tomorrow.

[SCRIBBLE]

Time for sleep. Stop dragging out the inevitable and grasping at straws. If not stan then vote SOMEONE. Stan is useless regardless as I doubt he would be around enough to cast a vote in the future. The only drawback to him being a VT is we lose a number in the majority figure. If he is a power role then he is a useless power role. You can ignore me but every policy lynch I have suggested on the first day in any mafia game I participated in ended up being spot on... the player is either useless or hiding something which is typically something anti-town.

- - - Updated - - -

useless as a power role****