Brett already answered you why I strongly believe Stan is a VT. Just like how blackmage used my first "oopsie" lynch count in last game, the mere fact that What didn't have to intervene to instantly replace stan who's being banwagoned hard shows that either What STRONGLY believes in his balancing to the point where killing off a possibly important role right off the bat is perfectly fine, OR stan wasn't that important to begin with... It was the same argument that someone threw at me in the previous game when i called for a deadline to my dismay. You tell me.
Pretty much my chain of thinking when I wanted to WAIT on lynching an afk, instead of immediately lynching without baiting out different outcomes to pull info from.
I dont understand this reasoning. You just did what nem did. I mean thank u for being intelligent enough to understand why i posted that assumption, but You SECOND my opinion that stan is a VT... yet go straight ahead to condemn what you believe is a VT to death? instead of pointing fingers at someone who could possibly be a scum?
Policy lynches are NEVER good... especially when we know he is most likely a VT... PRO TOWN. i'd say we keep him around for the extra vote when need be? and focus on trying to find scummy behavior?
---
The good news is that CURRENTLY, because we are only 2 votes away, we can clearly see that there ISNT a combination of any of those 2 roles at the SAME TIME: self hammerer, double voter, forced hammerer. Or else 2 of them would have forced a lynch by now.
- - - Updated - - -
love meh. u were the one that wanted my files before, jsut saying
that's fine tho, will keep that to myself, easier to see the bandwagoning orders.







.


Register To Reply