Right and by lynching Stan we obtain NO NEW information going into Night 1, kionay, essentially it IS a "nolynch" because we'd find out that he was a VT in the first place, which we already know. Going for a lynch on someone playing scummy from the onset is ideal and the point to this game, isn't it?

I mean it is a gamble because, Nemesis, MAY just be playing scummy because he's a cumcovered vietnamese midget prostitute, but if we give him the benefit of the doubt EVERY game, just because that's how he is in general, he can use that against us.

Here's what we know:

- STAN is most likely a VT or just a townie with a minimal role like "Innocent Child".
- SIN is a "claimed" VT as Rufus, who has yet to be counter-claimed.
- NEMESIS who has been trying to start a bandwagon to lynch SIN since he claimed, then proceeded to vote STAN (VT) to hop on the train with everyone else going for a "policy lynch"

Most of our votes have been against another Townie. Where the fuck is your logic, people?

For the day going as long as it has, we will learn nothing from it. WE GET NOTHING. I'd rather gamble and lose than go for the safe option and lose anyway.

If we lynch STAN we guarantee (2) dead Townies going into Day 2. We lynch Nemesis, it could go either way but I just have a feeling he's mafia.