Supernatural Mafia

[Passarelli]

Cyber, I was gone for most of the day. I managed to log on twice earlier to read up and make a short post. I voted fairly early considering this. I was wondering if anyone else saw that Nem was playing pretty scummy already on day 1. Most of his posts were vapid and pointless adding nothing to the conversation other then insulting people. I know that he is like this already without playing this game and that is why it makes it awfully hard to tell if he is Scum or not. I just wanted to make sure people understood that no lynch on day 1 is pretty bad strategy.

I was waiting to see if Stan would show up today before voting but someone voted for him so I figured I would finger Nem

You say I left the hard part for others, but I had already joke voted for Nem, and as soon as someone else voted for him I reinforced it. I didn't get online until then anyway--I likely would have voted for Nem as soon as a vote for Stan came up.

That said, I completely agree with you on people voting for Stan when he is most likely a VT. I do not see how everyone can see it as a valid strategy. I understand that someone being inactive can grind at you, but the object is to win. If you believe he is a VT, there is no reason to lynch him and removing him would be a boon to the mafia. We still get no good data from the vote, which--again--is the best tool the townies have to figure out who is scum and we lose a townie, which only helps the scum thin our ranks and make us waste the best tool available to us.

Finally Cyber, why don't you do the hard thing and cast your vote? You say I did nothing yet you haven't pointed any fingers yet.

[CYBER]

I actually DID fos nemesis earlier.


and i'm currently waiting on his goddamn input for a full day now, but surprisingly he walks away from the thread for the first time ever. Hell he was the lead active player in the previous game prodding ppl left and right to post, even at 5 am... and surprisingly he's been afk all day, and possibly STILL dodging my questions to him, you know, until some random guy comes in, votes stan, someone hammers it, and night 1 starts.
then surprisingly nemesis will show up tomorrow, all fine, and then "lead us to victory" STILL without answering any questions directed at him...

oh wait, that happened last game too. well i'll be damned. Let's rinse and repeat shall we.


and the reason why i haven't voted anyone yet, is because of how i always play the game. I don't like throwing votes out there that people can then bus around until I get all the facts that i need, and i have yet to get enough facts to either policy lynch stan, or worry about someone else in this game that i have been eye-ing, wondering how THEY are playing it out...

[Passarelli]

You did that after accusing me of doing nothing (same post, but still afterwards).

Cyber, I fail to see how you fingering Nem after I voted for him makes what you said to me any less hypocritical. I was the 3rd person to cast a vote. I cast that vote as soon as I caught up reading the thread as I had just gotten home from getting a job.

[CYBER]

You did that after accusing me of doing nothing (same post, but still afterwards).

Cyber, I fail to see how you fingering Nem after I voted for him makes what you said to me any less hypocritical. I was the 3rd person to cast a vote. I cast that vote as soon as I caught up reading the thread as I had just gotten home from getting a job.

I dont get what you're getting at.

In this game, "accusing" and "asking" or "interrogating" someone are wayy different.
I merely asked you to throw a name to vote on , someone you think could be a proper lynch target because we were lacking that.

Also , there IS a possibility that you voted in the following pages AFTER the quote I took from you. Because I was compiling a full comment from quotes while reading page by page... so it's possibly you thought i was referring to this after you voted, but i was targetting that post at the time you didn't. If that's the case, my bad for not paying attention, but i did not accuse you anywhere other than asked you for "help" or advice on who YOU thought was a proper target.


as for MY finger of suspicion on nemesis? It literally has NOTHING to do with your vote on him. Had I wanted to vote him, i would have. But like i said, my finger on him is purely to document the fact that I have been pressing on nemesis to answer a couple questions, and yet he's still dodging ,,, until this very moment. It would have been the same comment, and same FOS whether you voted him first, after, or not at all. My fos on him was purely based on how HE has been acting. not how many votes, like yours, he has on.