First thing's first. There's a TL;DR at the end.

Quote Originally Posted by DJ_MikeyRevile View Post
I will get started.

My post Here.

This post completely neglected me saying " Why not continue to scum hunt knowing your pool of suspects is even smaller." The conversation revolved around lynching a known vt or at least one that claimed to be vt. Therefor, your reason for lynching the person who claimed vt is based solely off the fact that you think one of two things.. 1. They are vt or 2. they are maf. Given the latter, my statement revolved around letting people know that, despite knowing who we will lynch, we shouldn't prematurely lynch. Prematuraly as in.. rush it and quick lynch.

Again, you ignored that part of my post you replied to. Thus, i came to a general and quick conclusion that you were subtly suggesting more people vote for minj. You know the guy who had not even claimed VT to begin with.
You're 100% correct. I ignored that part. I agree. Don't lynch someone you trust. If you trust them, hunt elsewhere. My problem was in the premise. Just because you're willing to lynch a VT doesn't mean you trust them. My point was, the willingness to hit a VT has nothing to do with trusting their claim.

Also, as you say, minj hasn't claimed VT, so how am I pushing to have someone who doesn't fall into that category? 1+1 != i However, I will admit I would not have minded people voting for Minj, someone who had not claimed yet.

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
Here is your question you claimed i never responded too
"I'm now just curious what made you bring that up?"
First response
In this post was passes quote voting minjae and saying he wouldn't mind lynching a vt.
"There you go. Next time do it yourself you lazy fig."
Try "Next time, find it yourself." The problem I had was that you said "do it" which involves an action. As I was asking your THOUGHTS, there was never any action for me to take. Second, see my response to your first post explaining why you're wrong.


Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
Second response


My third time now. Pass voted minjae while simultaneously stating that he wouldnt mind lynching a VT. The vote combined with that statement suggests that he assumes minjae is VT. If that is the case, i suggested it would be wise not to try and end the day fast. To wait a bit longer.
You see, if you'd actually used your words to make it clear like that, we'd have skipped to me calling you slow for other reasons! Like I said, not minding lynching a VT doesn't mean you assume they're VT. You are ONLY assuming that they aren't a town PR. It is the same exact claim a scum would make. Saying A does not neccisarily mean B. It MAY, but it is not REQUIRED. Secondly, no one was trying to end the day, quickly or not. We had 4 votes on Minj. One was your RVS. One was mine, based upon him (probably accidentally) soft claiming NOT Seer/Faith Healer. No one has even asked anyone else to vote. Plus, we haven't even gotten to L-1 or gotten a claim from Minj, which means we WOULD need more votes, since he's come out and said he has NOT soft claimed.

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
Now, as for the "my lying" portion. You are still incorrect and it is very clear given your reluctant behavior to stop this berating..
I admitted I was wrong here, but you said I was wrong about being wrong. I was more than willing to stop, you're the one who wouldn't let it go. You decided, rather than letting it go, to try to insult me again, lie about me, and say you meant what you said, which was not what you're saying you said.

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
that you are blind sided and skipping posts.
Do I really need to go through every line of every post and say "I agree with this" or "this doesn't matter with your premise being wrong" when replying to you?

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
That statement of mine is not a lie, it is an opinion, the way i view a persons behaviour. Did i use the word trust loosely? Perhaps but it does not negate the fact that it is an opinion and therefore can not be a lie.
It is presented as a fact. As you said it does NOT have any errors in semantics, you're NOW lying, because it's NOT posed as an opinion, and therefore CAN be a lie.

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
Secondly, this "lie" is your only talking point and the base of all your attacks on me. When in reality, even if it was questionable, it is miniscule and HARDLY worth noting at all. Its in relation to theory and how one person reads a player vs another.
Quite right. However, when someone is so bullheaded, and we are in RVS, it's as good of a lead as any.

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
So i conclude this blackmage, given your behavior.

You are not a town power role nor a town team. You would not be so vocal and childish if you were.
My past games would disagree with you.

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
I also personally conclude that you are not a werewolf, for the reason just stated.

That leaves VT and mafia. I do not think you are VT and here is why.
You were the first person to post. Your post was a very obvious post about what to do and not to do. By coming out the gate with "helpful advice" you attempted to win hearts and mines.
Why would you do that? Because as mafia, who can not night kill.. your only way to win is lead lynches on townies and werewolves. Your chance at winning is greatly reduced if you are not in charge or being listened to by a majority of town.
What you are doing right now is bashing me with senseless reasons.

If you are a VT then you are playing really bad and i suggest you let it go.

Wait, it's a scum play to make good plays? I'm rendered speechless. Also, why is it bad to push someone in the first day?

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
Your best post!
Why thank you.

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
had i said you contradicted yourself without cutting out the specific part and quoted it, im afraid you may not have understood. It is what you are asking of me, correct? to quote just the specific parts of posts?
Um, I don't see you saying I contradicted myself anywhere. I honestly DO NOT understand what you mean here.
Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
"You were trying to reply to my post by quoting someone else, using their entire quote instead of just the relevant portions."
alas, you did.
Wat?

Quote Originally Posted by Mikey
Im done with this ridiculous argument.
Don't leave me, I'm loney!

Oh, some other notes, Mikey says that my first post should be obvious, and still seems to believe it. Here's a fun fact for you all. In the first game Ibis did with Masons (Pokemon) Mikey outted his Mason buddy, before he'd even confirmed for this reason! You see, it wasn't obvious for him after 4 games, and yet it seems he thinks it SHOULD be obvious for everyone.

Mikey, as much fun as it was to watch you, you've already convinced yourself you've "figured out" what I am, and I have my suspicions of what you are. As such, unless someone else wants us to continue this, I think we're done here. Much longer and I think I'd just get bored.

TL;DR Mikey used Mikey Language, I corrected him. He clarifies, I admit I was wrong. He answers a question of mine in Mikey Language, insults me and declares I wasn't wrong enough. Knowning exactly what he meant, I poke the bear and have some fun for the next few hours, mostly trying to teach him proper english. Eventually, after 3 attempts, he clarifies one of the piece of Mikey Langauge I didn't understand. He says he's done and I get bored, so I think this is "the end" on the game activity.