IBIS 31337
Trig: Even if we have a protective role, we can't be assured he'd protect you. Short of your role winning the game if it survives till day three, the doc needs to choose who he thinks would be the most likely target.
You said investigate Rosie, he is hiding something when you were rushing the day, and the one who hammered. This means you were the one who allowed him to "hide something". The asking in itself wasn't the problem. The fuzzy logic you used was.Originally Posted by SCRIBBLE
IBIS
K hold on a sec, are you saying scribble was protecting rosie , trigger, or himself when he rushed through day 1? The wording's just off for me, maybe a rephrase might fix my confusion.
Also, I'm not defending scribble here, but I tell people "investigate X person" all the time. Mafia can't tell if the investigator will investigate X, or ignore it and investigate Y, or do neither and investigate Z (which is me). Case and point with Rosie's claim of investigating me. Instead of using lie detector on any of the people that I made type that, he went and investigated me, which is the most useless thing right now, even though i'm grateful for the backup "cyber's town" if he ever bit the dust and was confirmed lie detector.
What i'm trying to say is that, the mafia can't tell if the investigator, if any, followed suite on scribble's request, did the opposite, or investigated scribble. It's a WIFOM argument for them to even begin using that premise to establish a valid target for the night.
I'm still trying to find some common ground between blackmage and scribble, as they are currently at opposite sides.
Right now it's just a "he said " "She said" game, and we need more to pick between u 2.
Posting Permissions
Register To Reply
