View Poll Results: Ban or Unban

Voters
3. You may not vote on this poll
  • Ban

    1 33.33%
  • Unban

    2 66.67%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: ƬıɱƹŁɛƨƨ シ | 10-23-15 4:14am | STEAM_0:1:12300653

  1. Default

    Someone with that spray has been here longer than a month.
    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Logically I reserve the right to step in at any time and make a final judgement. Any judgement made by me can only be reversed by me.

  2. Default

    just to be clear rosie you're voting no? if you are close this and unban him. My vote is NO
    Quote Originally Posted by inthebutt View Post
    you all are a bunch oh whiny little bitches..
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitman
    0.o.....dem sum fightin wurdz LOL

    I am really scared.....You sending Fiona after me? LOL

  3. Default

    You guys are really going to make me dig through more demos aren't you..

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YM Beast View Post
    You guys are really going to make me dig through more demos aren't you..
    you want the ban? gotta do the leg work

    Through the darkness of futures past,
    The magician longs to see
    One chants out between two worlds:
    Fire, walk with me.

  5. Default

    Honestly I just don't see enough to ban.
    Unbanned, Closed.

  6. Default

    I'm bored, and I already wasted some time watching this demo before it was closed, so I'll weight in on this even though I don't need to.

    16k's the only fishy tick because it appears like he's shooting through the walls, and it's easy to tunnel vision on such an event if you're watching in r_draw the entire time and not looking at this again in plain view.

    Brett and I went through a crapton of demos like this during our no-homo BanBros phase (gd times...), and unfortunately, muzzle flash glitches, voice over head icon glitches, dropping bodies glitches, ghost flashlight walking around for no reason glitches, floor glitches (where they can see through the map), etc happen every now and then... because, well, valve.
    And this is the main reason you never ban based on ONE occurrence, but you compile multiple offenses that make it harder to refute.
    If there were more "wtf moments" compiled, then this tick CAN be used then, but not as a standalone ban reason.

    I'd say an UNOFFICIAL "no" to this ban request because i'm keeping this in ULA hands, not clan.

    REMEMBER, a "no" to a ban request does NOT mean that the person is not hacking, but that the demo itself is inconclusive. You think the person is hacking and got more demos?
    Do the grunt work of compiling more than 1 instance of hacks, and go for it again, there's no shame in trying.
    Hell, god knows we spent over a year compiling evidence over the Balto case. That's what differentiates good admins from great admins!


    Nice try Beast, at least you put in the effort, so don't get discouraged, and keep digging for more proof, if you think he's walling.

    Cheers.

    <Still Closed.>
    Started from bottom. Now we here. <IBIS>


    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Trying to hack in IBIS is like trying to kill someone in a police station, not the best idea...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •