I play CS with a helmet on

[DeadEyeDeNNi$]

Before Maynard, or anyone else says it, "If u don't have a demo, then it didn't happen !!!"

Well, I guess that pretty well sums it up.

Please DON'T waste the space, or our time by posting here IF YOU CANNOT FOLLOW PROTOCOL!!

[Fluffy Frufflebottoms]

You people are incredible. These allegations are fairly easy to prove without a demo. It's ridiculous how often the admin consensus in case of admin abuse reports is to give a free pass on a trivial technicality, rather than at least appearing to be troubled by the prospect of having an admin affecting gameplay negatively with impunity.

[THE HOLY SH**T!]

Omfg did anyone see that new commercial on tv?

[Andrew_Pavlik]

Okay well next time I will get a Demo and or SS for now on. But just to make sure, this isn't allowed correct?

[CYBER]

Okay well next time I will get a Demo and or SS for now on. But just to make sure, this isn't allowed correct?

as i told u in another post, ALWAYS demo everything u want to say. no one's word is valid here, unless 3+ ppl actually witnessed this.
any other admins happened to be around or real decent regs?? make them post here for now, until thread is closed, other than that, always demo.

[maynard]

because it's admin vs admin he doesn't really need a demo. all zero has 2 do is pull helmets admin logs, and if he was infact doing that and it's not allowed... well you guys get the rest... the proof is there, zero just needs 2 pull it up...

[OMGBEARS]

Lifting restrictions on a weapon just to pick it up then disabling it is, I would say, an abuse of admin powers. $11/month does not mean you can break the rules you agreed to follow and enforce. Senior admin doesn't play into it.

I would say this falls under section X of the server rules. Using the console to lift a ban, then re-instating the ban after you've purchased the weapon.

Bad form.

I suppose we'll have to see what ZERO says.

[CYBER]

because it's admin vs admin he doesn't really need a demo. all zero has 2 do is pull helmets admin logs, and if he was infact doing that and it's not allowed... well you guys get the rest... the proof is there, zero just needs 2 pull it up...

true, but zero has a lot on his plate, and having everything lie upon HIM finding out is not really the best move... sure there is always THAT as a backup plan, but if he had a demo, zero wouldn't have to be envolved except for the final ruling, makes evreyone's life easier to have a demo, but yes, i agree with u , u dont NEED a demo, so everyone who would say "demo or didnt happen", its not one of those cases because its admin vs admin, just like u said.

[Jeimuzu]

Before Maynard, or anyone else says it, "If u don't have a demo, then it didn't happen !!!"

Well, I guess that pretty well sums it up.

Please DON'T waste the space, or our time by posting here IF YOU CANNOT FOLLOW PROTOCOL!!

You are wrong, if he used chat to convey communication then all he would need is a time.

[Rellikdloc]

3+ ppl may not have witnessed it but 3+ ppl have reported admin abuse on him within the past week