Ron Paul 2012 (yes... mozart A FOURTH TIME!)

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Whats the probability of you gettting banned, And someone 15 minutes later comes in with MikeyRevile but be someone else? Ronpaul is probably mozart, the ips will prove that or disprove that but its highly unlikley that its someone else

.

I don't think you under stand. So ill explain it as if you were a child.

1. Mikeyrevile is not a common name where as Ron Paul 2012 is. He is a presidential caniadate.
2. How HGH server is amoung the top 5 most joined servers in counter strike with a wopping 100k joins a month.
3. It is likely that a diffrent person with the same name as Ron Paul 2012 joined the server. Steam search the name and read the results.
4. I have persoanlly seen the name tons of times in our servers.

Now that you have read that, go to paucity Stats, any of the servers will do and search the name ron Paul 2012. Compare steam IDs, come back here and re evaluate your made up statistics.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

insufficient evidence.


/bump

[CYBER]

insufficient evidence for the hacks on the OTHER thread? or for assuming it was the same guy?
because if u are answering for "assuming it was the right guy" then i want to point out that he has already been unbanned temporary.

now if you were referring to the hacks by the OTHER thread, i would have appreciated it if you replied to the other thread.

EDIT: never mind u answered my question by posting on the other thread. thx for feedback, although a more elaborate answer explaining certain ticks would have been nice, just so that we see what you saw.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

insufficient evidence for the hacks on the OTHER thread? or for assuming it was the same guy?
because if u are answering for "assuming it was the right guy" then i want to point out that he has already been unbanned temporary.

now if you were referring to the hacks by the OTHER thread, i would have appreciated it if you replied to the other thread.

EDIT: never mind u answered my question by posting on the other thread. thx for feedback, although a more elaborate answer explaining certain ticks would have been nice, just so that we see what you saw.

both threads need to be resolved and closed, you cant just let this one hang in limbo never to be seen again, thus the bump. Inconclusive evidence is still relevant here because you are banning him on the basis that he has multiple accounts, you have 0 proof to provide us with that backs your claim regarding this individual being the same individual from the other ban thread.

[maynard]

closed. unbanned.