View Poll Results: should player be banned?

Voters
1. You may not vote on this poll
  • Ban

    1 100.00%
  • Unban

    0 0%
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: SnpT/STEAM_0:0:7962847

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brett friggin favre View Post
    if you search for his name in our wcs stats, his steam id is the only one that matches that name. plus the 14 kills 14 headshots, on the same map, same time as the ban, should be obvious it's the same guy.
    I dont like comparing stat entries in order to get the steam id of a guy that was hacking on the servers... something that could have been easily circumvented by remembering to type sb_status in the demo... or to get the sourceTV... being that we cant do the perma without an sb_status demo, i went ahead and retrieved the demo myself from sourceTV at the ban datestamp...and actually watched it myself in entirety to make sure it's the right one... its a simple process lol... dont over complicate with comparisons and shit.
    so here you go ppl. Also, omega we talked yesterday, and its ok about this ban, but i trust that next time you would be more than ready to make a successful ban/thread in due time good job.

    tl;dr
    his steam id is :
    22: STEAM_0:0:7962847 SnpT pDwMBMlzmuCmX8QxiPBkHog/odP7LP6
    and he joins THIS sourceTV demo (dust2) that contains sb_status at tick mark 82700 ...
    obvious upside down aimbot with walls as a cherry on top. (yes, i also checked for walls bcos im THAT bored without a gaming pc... -.-)
    HACKS
    Started from bottom. Now we here. <IBIS>


    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Trying to hack in IBIS is like trying to kill someone in a police station, not the best idea...

  2. Default

    lol.. owns.. did we just post fucking identical posts at the same fucking time? i hate you , you and ur faster uploading pc
    just fyi, when its ANOTHER admin, other than u , that did a ban, u;re technically still supposed to wait for another ula to vote as far as i know, as it was not your ban.
    but the shit is too obvious and i was going to click YES on the vote anyway just after u closed it i see..

    i agree on perma, case closed.
    Started from bottom. Now we here. <IBIS>


    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Trying to hack in IBIS is like trying to kill someone in a police station, not the best idea...

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CYBER View Post
    lol.. owns.. did we just post fucking identical posts at the same fucking time? i hate you , you and ur faster uploading pc
    just fyi, when its ANOTHER admin, other than u , that did a ban, u;re technically still supposed to wait for another ula to vote as far as i know, as it was not your ban.
    but the shit is too obvious and i was going to click YES on the vote anyway just after u closed it i see..

    i agree on perma, case closed.
    Its an upside down obvious hacker. Was under the impression that obvious hacks can be permad and closed right away.

    If you were a beautiful sound in the echos all around, I'd be your harmony.

  4. Default

    as far as i know, what u just said applies to when u do ur own ban. not someone elses. meh, it's technicalities really, i dnt really give a fuck since im gonna post my true YES vote on those obvious ones regardless just to keep u in the clear.
    but i suggest you clarify this with maynard and other ULAs.
    Started from bottom. Now we here. <IBIS>


    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Trying to hack in IBIS is like trying to kill someone in a police station, not the best idea...

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CYBER View Post
    as far as i know, what u just said applies to when u do ur own ban. not someone elses. meh, it's technicalities really, i dnt really give a fuck since im gonna post my true YES vote on those obvious ones regardless just to keep u in the clear.
    but i suggest you clarify this with maynard and other ULAs.
    Got an answer from zero. Direct quote "We have in the past allowed for single vote closers if it is very obvious such as that it can be closed faster however note that if misapplied the ULA can get in a lot of trouble."

    So..basically..this guy is upside down. Doesn't get more obvious then that.

    Thought you would be interested to know for future reference as well.

    If you were a beautiful sound in the echos all around, I'd be your harmony.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XX0wnsXY View Post
    Got an answer from zero. Direct quote "We have in the past allowed for single vote closers if it is very obvious such as that it can be closed faster however note that if misapplied the ULA can get in a lot of trouble."

    So..basically..this guy is upside down. Doesn't get more obvious then that.

    Thought you would be interested to know for future reference as well.
    thanks for the info, was trying to reach zero too, but its not an easy feat to do on a cellphone lol...
    and yeah, the main reason i thought i should mention this earlier was because i dont want you to be doing something and not knowing the general rules about it , for ur sake good ban. moving along for more ppl to nom nom on.
    Started from bottom. Now we here. <IBIS>


    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Trying to hack in IBIS is like trying to kill someone in a police station, not the best idea...

  7. Default

    ULA don't need 2 have a vote for uber obvious hacks. if it's an upside down aimbot, or the person is running at 100% normal speed or doing something that's BEYOND fucking obvious it's hacks, no vote is needed.

    also, don't wait for Zero 2 reply when he's not even in the country, use half a brain and msg me on steam...

    Maynard - The WCS Guy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •