deLiGHT <3, 5/3/12, 5:40 pm EDT, STEAM_0:0:26279260

[Steamer]

I will go over this tic for tic when I have time, As of what I skipped through, no, wasn't enough. Still want more word on that KAC relation..... Still say he should be out for that alone linked to his Steam ID.

[brett friggin favre]

I will go over this tic for tic when I have time, As of what I skipped through, no, wasn't enough. Still want more word on that KAC relation..... Still say he should be out for that alone linked to his Steam ID.

i can't say any more on that...honestly i haven't looked into cheats enough to know where to even begin -.- but you take that and the 2 vac bans...clearly he has a history of hacking, and had hacks on his computer the day i banned him since that one id was vac banned then. but like i said, if you just need more and he's unbanned, i can get more. just a matter of when he comes back on.

here's what i can find on it though. apparently that ban comes from lua scripts run by members of the lua source scripting group (luass), which i remember coming across a week or 2 ago.

also this http://www.kigenac.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=940

[SCRIBBLE]

The first demo has a few spots I deem conclusive however before I make my final decision I am going to review it again to ensure what I saw wasn't an engine error or something similar. This is a great example of someone who knows how to hide it well as if the player knew he may be under scrutiny.

I will have the opportunity to review both again on my lunch break today. My vote will be cast then.

edit: reviewed both again. hacks. willing to explain in private, not posting detailed description to avoid swaying others into a vote.

[CYBER]

scribbs. just make sure u update ur private details AFTER votes are made, just for documentation purposes, so that we can learn his habits, if he hacks.

im sorry im not of any use recently, im temporary working 12+ hours shifts and 3 courses (that im thinking of skimming...)

[SCRIBBLE]

scribbs. just make sure u update ur private details AFTER votes are made, just for documentation purposes, so that we can learn his habits, if he hacks.

That was the plan.

[CYBER]

spasm is the more <strike>experienced</strike> (lol), make that skeptical one about walls. i was hoping he handles it because its a delicate ban with split ULA votes and he would favor the inconclusive in hopes of a better demo, than banning uncertainly a possible innocent player (not that there's anything innocent about the guy...)...

but if this thread is not voted on by nightfall (sounds poetic right?), then i'll assess it myself with my own experience and private detailed work.
and im told to be a douchebag with thesis paper posts :P just saying

[acolyte_to_jippity]

spasm is the more <strike>experienced</strike> (lol), make that skeptical one about walls. i was hoping he handles it because its a delicate ban with split ULA votes and he would favor the inconclusive in hopes of a better demo, than banning uncertainly a possible innocent player (not that there's anything innocent about the guy...)...

but if this thread is not voted on by nightfall (sounds poetic right?), then i'll assess it myself with my own experience and private detailed work.
and im told to be a douchebag with thesis paper posts :P just saying

for the record, zero doesn't have the strikethrough html enabled here.