Lt.Pickles 06-01-12 02:55 STEAM_0:1:50958066

[Steamer]

Take another look yourself, look for walls.

I see no sign of aimbot.

[Spasm]

What I don't understand is why he posts aimbot when there is no aimbot but sights spots where he thinks hes walling..???!!??

[CYBER]

Im not sure spasm but perhaps he copy pasted the thread format from Another thread and changed the different info and forgot to change the hacking reason? That or he meant to say walls instead of aimbot, it hallened to me once then i went and re-edited my thread. I will try to take a look at this thread but i cant promise anything given my unbelievably busy schedule till tuesday:s

[maynard]

stop worrying about his logic, and worry about your own.


3 ULA posts... not 1 vote...

[Steamer]

No third option for me to vote. IE: Inconclusive.

[brett friggin favre]

No third option for me to vote. IE: Inconclusive.

I don't like having a third option. If its inconclusive, that's no ban, i.e. vote no. you can elaborate on that no vote in you're post but if the demo is not conclusive, vote no ban.

[Steamer]

It's the shit people usually type for poll that bothers me. A simple Ban or Don't Ban I would vote Don't. When people say "No, he doesn't hack" as an option, I do not like voting it.

Voted NO as INCONCLUSIVE

There are things that seem like signs of walling, as knowing position on certain occasions and timing of passage. Some spots he wont even go near as he "knows" people are crouch camping, IE: The hostie window with T in corner. Need more evidence. Don't jump the gun so fast. Take you time with walling and make sure there is a big amount of evidence when they don't directly trace.