Lt.Pickles 06-01-12 02:55 STEAM_0:1:50958066

[Steamer]

No third option for me to vote. IE: Inconclusive.

[brett friggin favre]

No third option for me to vote. IE: Inconclusive.

I don't like having a third option. If its inconclusive, that's no ban, i.e. vote no. you can elaborate on that no vote in you're post but if the demo is not conclusive, vote no ban.

[Steamer]

It's the shit people usually type for poll that bothers me. A simple Ban or Don't Ban I would vote Don't. When people say "No, he doesn't hack" as an option, I do not like voting it.

Voted NO as INCONCLUSIVE

There are things that seem like signs of walling, as knowing position on certain occasions and timing of passage. Some spots he wont even go near as he "knows" people are crouch camping, IE: The hostie window with T in corner. Need more evidence. Don't jump the gun so fast. Take you time with walling and make sure there is a big amount of evidence when they don't directly trace.

[maynard]

feel free 2 start bitch smacking people who make stupid poll questions. I fully support it. these forms should be professional and it's clearly stated in the "how 2 post" thread that...

Also you MUST create a poll with 2 options:
Ban
Unban

[brett friggin favre]

feel free 2 start bitch smacking people who make stupid poll questions. I fully support it. these forms should be professional and it's clearly stated in the "how 2 post" thread that...

Also you MUST create a poll with 2 options:
Ban
Unban

duly noted, you'll have no more bs from me.

as far as this case goes, my vote would be yes for walls. watch ticks 9k, 13k, and 15k through the end of that round. tons of dead on walltraces just that early in the demo.

he does also have one other ban i could find, for aimbot/wallhacks http://nomstats.clanservers.com/bann...xt=&lg=Latvian , banned on 5/19.

also his steam profile is not set up, so it's likely a relatively new account.

and more: through this info i found an old steamid (same name, same ip) http://www.clanbam.com/stats1/player.php?id=3149 which was vac banned on 5/2

that data gives me more reason to say: BAN.

[Steamer]

Make me go back and rewatch new tick marks... I already voted damnit. -_-

He is dead at 9K
13k you can see the T run in and out and wasn't really direct tracing.
15k+ screams walls.

You sure you weren't watching Lunchbox at tick 9k?

Can I change my vote YES as I rewatched for walling? >.>

[brett friggin favre]

Make me go back and rewatch new tick marks... I already voted damnit. -_-

He is dead at 9K
13k you can see the T run in and out and wasn't really direct tracing.
15k+ screams walls.

You sure you weren't watching Lunchbox at tick 9k?

Can I change my vote YES as I rewatched for walling? >.>

oh yeah 9k was noted down well after the tick, i meant to go back to that point to get the correct tick but forgot to. should i have been? wink wink

[CYBER]

Make me go back and rewatch new tick marks... I already voted damnit. -_-

He is dead at 9K
13k you can see the T run in and out and wasn't really direct tracing.
15k+ screams walls.

You sure you weren't watching Lunchbox at tick 9k?

Can I change my vote YES as I rewatched for walling? >.>

well as far as rulings go for ULAs, we can only change our vote from YES to a NO, but not vice versa.
Seeing that you already voted NO, unless clan intervenes and allows you to recast your vote, you're pretty much stuck with ur vote... That;s one reason why I also check for walls in aimbot demos... lol
im on a unix platform now, cant rly check the demo or anything until i get home at night and view it on my computer...