WCS Previous Scrim Comments.

[Spasm]

"I'm sorry cyber, we traded you to HellsGamers for future considerations"

I'm sorry what but I am going to be taking my talents to SOUTH BEACH

[::Paper::]

I did spoke up in the thread when teams first came out. I also did spoke out in dust2 when Paper came in. No one listened. 5v4 would've been unfair, but with teams already skewed, that was the end of it. Finally, I tried until it was possible when most of people have given up I.E. mid dust. And to be completely fair, I can't really blame people as teams were not balanced... To be mild.



Possible to rig teams. Once people have signed up, then we should have captains discreetly select their co-captains and their teams. So no one would feel left out or bad. Fair and without hard feelings.

Sweet I unbalanced the teams i feel good! but in all honesty I would have played anyway if we played it like last time this scrim seemed very last minute I voted for the last 2 and this team lucky i was asked kudos to you cyber btw
I also support making a league with teams

[CYBER]

Sweet I unbalanced the teams i feel good! but in all honesty I would have played anyway if we played it like last time this scrim seemed very last minute I voted for the last 2 and this team lucky i was asked kudos to you cyber btw I also support making a league with teams

it was between u and and immune... And no offence but immune is a lottt better. So it had to be u when maynard asked me if i have problems u joining

[What]

it was between u and and immune... And no offence but immune is a lottt better. So it had to be u when maynard asked me if i have problems u joining

Well duh immune is better, and honestly paper ain't a big deal. The thing was though, you had an advantage going in, and then replacing chef with a better player further increased that advantage. I still think we could have won if we tried harder more consistently so I don't think it was a huuuge deal, but what we should have done is given us paper in exchange for someone else.

[Masskid]

I still think we could have won if we tried harder more consistently

And someone wasnt in our ear, killing out moral.... yes tom im looking at you -_-

[What]

What might be fun, and I'm just throwing this out there, if for the scrims, everyone has max money, so it is more of a skill/strategy thing than the team that gets the quick money advantage from a first round or two win. Since money is essential in WCS, the team without it can get destroyed from lack of cash alone.

[Rosie]

Correct class change offsets cash advantage. Every kid who runs a race should not get a damn trophy.

[CYBER]

What might be fun, and I'm just throwing this out there, if for the scrims, everyone has max money, so it is more of a skill/strategy thing than the team that gets the quick money advantage from a first round or two win. Since money is essential in WCS, the team without it can get destroyed from lack of cash alone.

hell no.
If u lost a few rouds at start u get item discount. If u constantly give ppl 16k per round, then the loosing team (which is sometimes a temporary loss due to strategy editing) will have an inherit advantage with unlimite money and cheaper items.

This defies the logic of scrimming btw: controlling and strategizing both ur actions AND ur spendings. If u're buffing a loosing team they might overpower the punished winning team. The latter team might not recover from such reversal due to the fact that the goal is 10 wins.

[What]

In a scrim with a 10 round cap, the cheaper items never really become a factor, and of course that wouldn't be included with added money. And no, correct race choices will not alleviate the cash disadvantage with so few people playing, the races which can counteract, or lessen the disadvantage of cash, are often not going to help as these races tend to be nullified themselves when the opposing team can afford laces and other items. In such a small scale venture, and with such skilled players, race whoring is not the answer since its the matter of the course.

Also just a suggestion, knew there would be blowback, but so far nothing too convincing.

[CYBER]

In a scrim with a 10 round cap, the cheaper items never really become a factor, and of course that wouldn't be included with added money. And no, correct race choices will not alleviate the cash disadvantage with so few people playing, the races which can counteract, or lessen the disadvantage of cash, are often not going to help as these races tend to be nullified themselves when the opposing team can afford laces and other items. In such a small scale venture, and with such skilled players, race whoring is not the answer since its the matter of the course.Also just a suggestion, knew there would be blowback, but so far nothing too convincing.

if you wanted your blowback, take it to your mom