WCS Previous Scrim Comments.

[SCRIBBLE]

Or 6v6 like this time. Any more and it gets to be madness, takes all the strategy out and that's why its a scrim in the first place

Actually, more players per team increases the amount of strategy required.

[CYBER]

Actually, more players per team increases the amount of strategy required.

well, for me the 6 vs 6 was a bit of a clusterfuck.
i prefer 5 vs 5.
5 is the minimum to have a full force going to do an objective, countered by another full force doing the same. 5 vs 6 is not a hard thing to do every now and then, so when u have that 6th member doing respawning only, you dont sacrifice strength vs respawning skill anymore as much as u would have in a 5v5...

face it, 5vs5, if someone dedicates only to respawn like BM, then the team is sacrificing early offensive strength bcos 4 vs 5 is harder than 5vs6 imo... this was shown in first scrim, but in second scrim it became too much of a clusterfuck...
but hey... as long as its <= 6vs6, its gd.

[maynard]

yep, personally, id put in another rule just for the wcs scrim event that you can only have 1 player have the same race, making it much more difficult as well as adding skill and teamwork which is always needed in a WCS game. Having 1 player play 1 race makes your team think twice on who should be playing which race and who should be support or who should be the guy that charges in first, not 5 ppl on human or jack. Just a thought.

....No

[Sin]

Maybe next time maynard will play like I asked him to the last scrim!

[CYBER]

Maybe next time maynard will play like I asked him to the last scrim!

between him and rambo... we probably would have had a better chance if maynard played

[Spasm]

yep, personally, id put in another rule just for the wcs scrim event that you can only have 1 player have the same race, making it much more difficult as well as adding skill and teamwork which is always needed in a WCS game. Having 1 player play 1 race makes your team think twice on who should be playing which race and who should be support or who should be the guy that charges in first, not 5 ppl on human or jack. Just a thought.

nobody cares what you think

[Masskid]

nobody cares what you think

Second

[maynard]

Second

third

[Chikun]

nobody cares what you think

I find it amusing.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

third

shit, what's the roberts rules of order guideline for this. we've had a motion, it's been seconded, and ternary confirmed. i guess we put it to a vote.

all in favor?