Quote Originally Posted by CYBER View Post
I like this better...
i like the way u think. u're still a fag, but yeah. We can elect a leader since it takes forever to start a scrim nway, and then maynard can contact them, and they can flip a coin, and go through their preferences 1 by 1 for a balanced game.

Although we had an edge in the players this time, but it wasn't anywhere CLOSE to the stackage that happened in the last scrim... u know... the one where useless-rambo subbed u and we still got our ass kicked?

Hell, the first map we were going neck and neck. u guys went 9-8 and almost won, we stole the last 2 rounds from u guys by 1 survivor... so yeah...there you have it. If anything? i got pms from players on ur team saying that YOU guys gave up starting since we swapped sides on office.
You guys had a chance... but you blew it, and thats coming from the one useless player in scrims: me.

friendly bashing aside? that idea could be better for the next scrim than simply to rely on stats.
You have got to be kidding me... :|

You had motherfucking 4 players better than me when Paper came in. The ONLY reason we were doing well at first because we were all organized and prepared with tactics - I've made an Excel spreadsheet with pretty much all tactics from the beginning. Teams were more stacked than ever before... Literally once you realized what we were doing and countered, we were fucked. We tried up until mid dust just when we saw that literally nothing we can do will do shit.

Yes, you were the worst in their team, but still better than 2 of our and probably on par with What. Literally, the only worse stack could have been switch Masskid with you and it's a perfect stack.