Remember, you asked for thisSeriously though, this is not because I'm trying to prove "I still do this". This just took more words to reply to. You're the first to really ask questions of me.
What:
On Mass, you disagreed with me, and also seem to have misunderstood what I was saying. I disagree with your assessment of his play style. He played similar to this that entire game (wcs). Yes his voting pattern has changed, but if he's a double voter, or has a vote restriction, there may be a reason for that. In wcs he was here in name only, and active at night. Yes, he posted, but said nothing of importance. What has he said of use this game? He's softclaimed. He's still said nothing, I'm still suspicious of him, until he says something of use. I was just saying, he may need replaced as well. Last time, part of the reason he was silent seems to have been lack of ability to play. I did not suggest he was clear, just that he has played similar to this before, and was replaced that time. I'm still suspicious of him, as he's done nothing to remedy the situation. Was I supposed to restate this?
Scribble, on the other hand, asked for questions. I just restated the questions he ignored before that. He has been playing oddly, talking at night. Yes, I started grilling him, but he was the one available that I had questions for, Mass was not.
Onto why I'm usually making shorter posts. Look at the wcs game. How often did people straight up ignore my posts because of length? Look at this game. My longer posts often have things ignored. Almost 100 posts later, and no one other than Brett even mentioned my thing about Mikey. I like making long posts, and still do. However, when I want to be listened to by the plebeians, I make more concise posts. On a related note, I was writing shorter in the Roman game. I'm also the only one whose gameplay you wrote about in that game. I find it odd that you choose to ignore this.
However, on the straight man/funny man, and being annoyed at being shot at by a teammate, I can't refute that. It wouldn't impress me much.
Brett:
More on Mass, as it's a softclaim, and he hasn't replied since then, if we have another squirtle, he could be waiting for a hardclaim. As it is, if the other claimed right now, Mass could easily say, "No, I was just messing with you". Not saying this is true, Mass could just as easily BE our Squirtle, but I'm wary of soft claiming.
For scribble:
Affiliation: Take a guess. Without some kind of proof, or odd game, would anyone really claim a non-town ? I have a role. Giving out what your role is less than helpful. It can even be dangerous. Just look, we had to lynch Taz because we knew his role. Declaring PGO or Bomb ruins their effectiveness. There has to be a good reason why you give out your role. Curiosity is NOT a good reason.
Blade:
The problem with voting is probably, no one wants to be Judas if we hit a townie. I wish we had someone who I could trust as our clear.
---------- Post added at 11:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:53 PM ----------
I rest my caseOriginally Posted by Nemesis
Also, making shorter posts means I can get them out, and not have to worry about people making 18 posts from the time I start...
Register To Reply
