Mafia Game: Monster Mash (Hosted by Sin and What)

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Wtf? Was that another soft claim? Are you a mafia and you know who the other mafia is?

- - - Updated - - -



I lol'd hahaha

Shhhhhh, minjae has said several times he did not sodt nor claim. Yet a few people are insisting he did and that he would be a safe lynch because of it.

The thing is, if someone admots to being ok with lynching a vt, that means they trust there vt. Why lynch someone you trust? Why not continue to scum hunt knowing your pool of suspects is even smaller.

[Blackmage]

Shhhhhh, minjae has said several times he did not sodt nor claim. Yet a few people are insisting he did and that he would be a safe lynch because of it.

The thing is, if someone admots to being ok with lynching a vt, that means they trust there vt. Why lynch someone you trust? Why not continue to scum hunt knowing your pool of suspects is even smaller.

Actually, saying you're ok with lynching a VT means that you understand that in this setup, during D1 at least 3 out of the 4 scum will claim VT. However, if it ISN'T one of the scum, you're not hitting, or outting, a PR in the process. I'm ok with hitting a VT too. Doesn't mean that's what I'm aiming for.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Actually, saying you're ok with lynching a VT means that you understand that in this setup, during D1 at least 3 out of the 4 scum will claim VT. However, if it ISN'T one of the scum, you're not hitting, or outting, a PR in the process. I'm ok with hitting a VT too. Doesn't mean that's what I'm aiming for.

But he hasnt claimed vt, so we dont have a vt to lynch. The point im making here is that, of you know the guy is vt and trust it... why not scum hunt longer... willingly lynching a town prematurely is bad. Stop encouraging it.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

I will get started.

Actually, saying you're ok with lynching a VT means that you understand that in this setup, during D1 at least 3 out of the 4 scum will claim VT. However, if it ISN'T one of the scum, you're not hitting, or outting, a PR in the process. I'm ok with hitting a VT too. Doesn't mean that's what I'm aiming for.

This post completely neglected me saying " Why not continue to scum hunt knowing your pool of suspects is even smaller." The conversation revolved around lynching a known vt or at least one that claimed to be vt. Therefor, your reason for lynching the person who claimed vt is based solely off the fact that you think one of two things.. 1. They are vt or 2. they are maf. Given the latter, my statement revolved around letting people know that, despite knowing who we will lynch, we shouldn't prematurely lynch. Prematuraly as in.. rush it and quick lynch.

Again, you ignored that part of my post you replied to. Thus, i came to a general and quick conclusion that you were subtly suggesting more people vote for minj. You know the guy who had not even claimed VT to begin with.


Here is your question you claimed i never responded too

I'm now just curious what made you bring that up?

First response

There you go. Next time do it yourself you lazy fig.

In this post was passes quote voting minjae and saying he wouldn't mind lynching a vt.
Second response

Perhaps this is a literacy thing... I answered your question with passes quote you fucking moron. Aside from that, I dont aee you asking anything elae and here yoy are accusing me of lying.

My third time now. Pass voted minjae while simultaneously stating that he wouldnt mind lynching a VT. The vote combined with that statement suggests that he assumes minjae is VT. If that is the case, i suggested it would be wise not to try and end the day fast. To wait a bit longer.



Now, as for the "my lying" portion. You are still incorrect and it is very clear given your reluctant behavior to stop this berating.. that you are blind sided and skipping posts. That statement of mine is not a lie, it is an opinion, the way i view a persons behaviour. Did i use the word trust loosely? Perhaps but it does not negate the fact that it is an opinion and therefore can not be a lie. Secondly, this "lie" is your only talking point and the base of all your attacks on me. When in reality, even if it was questionable, it is miniscule and HARDLY worth noting at all. Its in relation to theory and how one person reads a player vs another.

So i conclude this blackmage, given your behavior.

You are not a town power role nor a town team. You would not be so vocal and childish if you were.
I also personally conclude that you are not a werewolf, for the reason just stated.

That leaves VT and mafia. I do not think you are VT and here is why.
You were the first person to post. Your post was a very obvious post about what to do and not to do. By coming out the gate with "helpful advice" you attempted to win hearts and mines.
Why would you do that? Because as mafia, who can not night kill.. your only way to win is lead lynches on townies and werewolves. Your chance at winning is greatly reduced if you are not in charge or being listened to by a majority of town.
What you are doing right now is bashing me with senseless reasons.

If you are a VT then you are playing really bad and i suggest you let it go.

- - - Updated - - -

This is not opinion, this is how language works. The sentence you used is an opinion

Your best post!

- - - Updated - - -

had i said you contradicted yourself without cutting out the specific part and quoted it, im afraid you may not have understood. It is what you are asking of me, correct? to quote just the specific parts of posts?

- - - Updated - - -

You were trying to reply to my post by quoting someone else, using their entire quote instead of just the relevant portions.

alas, you did.

- - - Updated - - -

Im done with this ridiculous argument.