SweatingBullets_MN

[lukeydukey]

i don't mind reducing the ban but i don't agree on a full unban based of the fact that cts were warned multiple times not to blow the bridge with that many humans on it

tking 1/2 the team can't be weighed as a win because the zombie died with them imho.

[Pink]

I am glad you rpely, but i really dont find it right for some one trying to same human kind to get banned at all. I mean if the person was just a TK lamer then yes ban them. But he killed the zombie and saved the humans

[walterbrunswick]

This is a tough call.

I would have to side with Pink. I would rather my brother-in-arms kill me than let the enemy get to me.

Lukeydukey's ban was unjustified if this is the case.

[mastercheff]

i think if he took a mother fucking zombie down he deserves to be unbanned even though it was just half

[&&toasties]

i don't mind reducing the ban but i don't agree on a full unban based of the fact that cts were warned multiple times not to blow the bridge with that many humans on it

tking 1/2 the team can't be weighed as a win because the zombie died with them imho.

I'm kind of half and half here.

If there was half of the team on the bridge, Luke was right in banning.

Win or not, killing half of the team, screwing with THEIR scores, to save your own ass, is not right at all.

Now...

If there was only the zombie there, he had no right.

...

Luke is a hardass, and for good reasons too.

When he got admin back, the server started cleaning up, because he doesn't put up with ANY bullshit...

[Pink]

I think luke is a good admin, I think I would agree with luke most of the time but I think a badcall happen every makes badcalls now and then. I want that person to be unbanned thats why I am here I am here for the people.

[Christmas]

Sometimes humans have to die so the rest can live.

Wasn't there, so it is hard to judge. Ban seems too long considering there was a zombie on it, and it is perfectly reasonable for him to make a rash decision based on the fact a zombie was coming. The ban is in place to prevent malpractice, and I don't think that is the case here.

[XxMastagunzxX]

We all have our opinions, but let me say this. I would not have banned him. If I had it especially would have not been a week but for maybe 10 minutes. It is up to lukey or somebody of higher authority to unban him so do not take it into your own hands.

[Shinkiro]

Well if i was killed on that bridge zombie or fucking not i would have been pissed.........mostly because i didnt do it, or at least next time before u push the plunger say "JUMP OFF THE GODDAMN BRIDGE U FUCKING IDIOTS... NOW!!"

[Jeimuzu]

Whenever someone prenuked or destroyed a bridge after I warned everyone at the beginning of the round via mic and chat, I would ban them for 1-2 days depending on my mood. However, I would often tell people not to stand next to the button until they need to, otherwise I would move them to spec. That way they don't get accused.

But if someone was doing this over and over again, despite several warning, I would ban them for a good 7 days.