Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Whyt Admin Abuse

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Default

    Actually a demo is not needed as proof as the logs can be used as proof. Whyte even if another admin is breaking the rules you can not punish them. Do not do this again.



  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Actually a demo is not needed as proof as the logs can be used as proof. Whyte even if another admin is breaking the rules you can not punish them. Do not do this again.
    I don't think either of them are admins ZERO
    -The enemy of my enemy is my friend-

  3. Default

    As ITB stated. They're not admins. To prove admin abuse...a demo or logs are proof. You are correct.

  4. Default

    Oops sorry, it was so obvious that something like this could not be abuse unless there was a demo with voice from both sides I just assumed that he must have been an admin b/c that is the only way it possibly could be abuse!

    Sorry again...



  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Oops sorry, it was so obvious that something like this could not be abuse unless there was a demo with voice from both sides I just assumed that he must have been an admin b/c that is the only way it possibly could be abuse!

    Sorry again...
    We still love you...LOL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •