Maynard - The WCS Guy
yes, but quite gay just the same
no, my point was and I still believe that when zero made this rule "A) Gay men or body parts" that the second part of it means no naked men images. as where the first half declares no gay conent of any kind.
Maynard - The WCS Guy
Personally I am Not a fan of the spray... and I have to agree the no Gay men or body parts seems pretty straight forward.
And the whole art defense... Come on art is very loosely defined.
I'm sure pedo's think that loli porn is artistic... that doesn't mean your gonna see it in an art gallery any time soon.
The min someone can show me an art gallery or institute were this naked harry potter and horse spray is I will retract the statement.
Either way it seems this spray was def meant to troll people. I'm getting tired of people using questionable sprays with all the images out there that could be used.
I don't think anyone will listen until we hear from Zero... and I would venture to guess he has a lot more pressing matters on his plate right now.
I notice I been little hostile and thats not never good when trying to make any kind of statement. I apologize to Maynard for being rude.
Not really this is a science museum and not an art museum.
I stand by my statement as I did not see them advertising the infamous Harry potter with a horse picture anywhere... and I am already fully aware that nudity and yes male penises can be found at most art museum.
My point was Anything can be labeled as Artistic or art.
The argument isn't about is a nude male art... the main argument was... is it against the rules? A) Gay men or body parts
And yes I did read the "In addition to the biological section of the museum, visitors can view the collection of about one hundred artistic oddments and other practical utensils related to the museum´s chosen theme."
Last edited by Vladninja; 08-30-2010 at 05:25 PM.