YOUmadBRAH? ibis.a

[StarsMine]

Maynard, carina is right about the privacy laws. You are not allowed under law to spread someones picture around with out that persons consent. hell your not allowed to take a persons picture w/o there consent.

[maynard]

Maynard, carina is right about the privacy laws. You are not allowed under law to spread someones picture around with out that persons consent. hell your not allowed to take a persons picture w/o there consent.

feel free 2 show me any law enforcement agency that claims that, and that claims they will infact charge you for re using someone's pic on counter strike lol... you guys are just grasping at straws. by your logic there would be no paparazzi. the end result, it's counter strike and nothing will ever come of him re using that pic in a legal way lol... also, we're not police officers. we're IBIS admins, we enforce the TOS and our rules.

I'm done with this thread, it's beyond silly 2 argue that some kinda legal matter is going 2 happen, in fact, hey hall, go call the police, see what they do about it or how much they give a shit that someone named "craigboner" or whatever is re using a personal picture of you on counter strike lol....

[StarsMine]

paparazzis get away with it because it costs to much to charge ever damn one of them, some of them do get charged though when a famous person gets pissed off enough

Our servers our based in america and because of that we are forced (well try to force) to abide by American laws

[SCRIBBLE]

Maynard, carina is right about the privacy laws. You are not allowed under law to spread someones picture around with out that persons consent. hell your not allowed to take a persons picture w/o there consent.

You can be liable for using someone's personal photograph for commercial gain.

Where's the commercial gain?

There isn't a rule or a law forbidding what happened with Hall.

[maynard]

You can be liable for using someones personal photograph for commercial gain.

Where's the commercial gain?

There isn't a rule or a law forbidding what happened with Hall.

exactly they're taking a law and just bending it 2 there will so it suits there argument, regardless of the legalities that are behind that law in it's self. like I said before, it's only against the law if you're profiting from it, or are doing things that will come back 2 the person and harsh hurt there credibility (like looking for sex with kids), or say re using halls picture for a fake ID or something like that.

craig did nothing wrong by spraying hall's pic.

[Mrs. Xen_Warrior]

All of that is really irrelevant to this thread because he wasn't banned for spraying hallwagners picture and Brian wasn't the one asking him to change it anyways. Brian banned him because he was constantly team killing after asking him to stop for 30 MINUTES. His ban is up close this thread and end the flame war.

[hallwagner]

You can be liable for using someone's personal photograph for commercial gain.

Where's the commercial gain?

There isn't a rule or a law forbidding what happened with Hall.

regardless its disrespect, and against the server rules.

[maynard]

regardless its disrespect, and against the server rules.

it's not disrespect you idiot. lmfao.. wow you're thick in the head.

if he wrote on your picture "FAG" and a buncha other derogatory things, you could claim it's dis respect, but he's not. if he's just re spraying it, and it's un-altered, then it's in no way disrespectful. once again, get over yourself.

All of that is really irrelevant to this thread because he wasn't banned for spraying hallwagners picture.

yeah I know, was just pointing out that unless the picture is altered 2 insult the person, there's 0 reason for an admin 2 get involved. or if the person is claiming in text they're hall and saying a buncha shit that would in fact cause problems for him, there's no claim of disrespect.

[hmdbrian]

you are all arguing over stupid pointless shit, none of this has shit to do with why he was muted nor banned...no one should use others names or impersonate in my opinion, just for the fact is a douche thing to do...but ddrop this shit, has nothing to do with his ban.

[hallwagner]

it's not disrespect you idiot. lmfao.. wow you're thick in the head.

if he wrote on your picture "FAG" and a buncha other derogatory things, you could claim it's dis respect, but he's not. if he's just re spraying it, and it's un-altered, then it's in no way disrespectful. once again, get over yourself.



yeah I know, was just pointing out that unless the picture is altered 2 insult the person, there's 0 reason for an admin 2 get involved. or if the person is claiming in text they're hall and saying a buncha shit that would in fact cause problems for him, there's no claim of disrespect.

you dumb bro? yea you dumb bro.....what a retard