- If sin's hinting is about RECEIVING a fruit:Originally Posted by SCRIBBLE
I don't think blade just forgets to say what fruit he got.
What is possible is that sin intentionally did not describe the fruit so that no one could easily claim being the vendor and so he can confirm or deny any such claims of that role down the road.
Now as to WHY sin is talking about fruits is because he could be the lightning rod, whether he knew that openly beforehand or as a hidden modifier. And he is mentioning fruit so that the food vendor notices that it's sin who got the fruit.
If the fruit vendor sent it to someone else and sin received it, we can then deduce that there was a lightning rod in play.
If the vendor sent it to sin and sin received it, then there is no lightning rod in play UNLESS the vendor happened to send it to sin, and sin doesn't know he's a lightning rod as a hidden modifer... Yata Yata, that last scenario sounds too improbable for my taste.
- if sin's hinting is about SENDING A fruit :
Then sin is a fruit vendor.
Then sin intentionally didn't mention what fruit kind it is so that the goddamn person who received it claims the fruit type.
Then we go back to the ultimatum before:
If that person wasn't sin's target, then we have a lightning rod, and that lightning rod is whoever got the fruit, whether they know it or not.
If it was his intended target, we can say that MOST likely, there is no lightning rod for the same reasons in the previous points, and start arguing again about the less likely scenarios before the lightning rod theory.
So what is it sin? U the sender or receiver?
Ergo. If there is a fruit vendor, which is a useless role to keep hidden from ppl, speak up and say who u sent the fruit to so we can seduce if there was a damn lightning for sure or go back to the harder options...
- - - Updated - - -
My phone went retarded again.
The "ergo" paragraph Was meant to be at the end of the "receiving" bulletpoint, right before the second bullet point.
Register To Reply
