Blade's Soft Drink Themed Mafia Game

[CYBER]

Couldn't it be possible that nem is a rb, but rb for mafia? And mafia just did a no-kill to make it seem like whoever they targeted to be role blocked as a mafia?
Just trying to get other ideas here other than 1 thing to go by.

Although RB is a generically used mafia role, and thus possible to be the case, it is VERY unlikely that he would bring himself into spotlight like that to call out assassin for no reason. Especially after him being one of the early adopters of "Just because you are a roleblocker, or confirmed roleblocker, does not mean you are town, if anything you are more like to be a mafia goon" philosophy.
But for him to put himself on the spot like that is very non-mafia-like trait at the moment.
And just to tell you something, although it sounds good in theory, it is generally a very bad play to not attack as a mafia, no matter how convoluted it sounds, because you're simply wasting a -1 townie chance for the sake of creating confusion.
In ibis, you don't need to pretend to kill to cause confusion, the players will get confused no matter what, so the whole charade serves no purpose but to satisfy a personal epeen that you didn't need to kill first night. That's all.
And although Niggasis is the definition of "Full of epeens", he wouldn't pull that entire elaborate plan by wasting a -1 on the townies just to confuse us... Claims like Asassin's and your motion for the cop to CC it is enough confusion on its own lol...

The mafia attack is a mute point anyways if they attacked me. Also, Nem could be a lyncher, remember that role?

surely you mean MOOT point.
or do you SPECIFICALLY mean MUTE point, which is defined as “When somebody in a group makes a good suggestion, but somehow nobody hears it.” . Which is a totally different thing.
Also maybe you can elaborate on that.


Also, isn't a lyncher treated like a joker as a bastard role ? because it ends the game? or simply gives away a partial useless win?

[CYBER]

to add on onto the Phil argument :
if anything, if there's a mafia, that WASN't roleblocked by nemesis (aka assassin), nor denied by a doctor or bodyguard or faith healers, or dodged by commuter or hider or vest or bulletproof or other crap,
then they would have to have attacked WHAT as the serial killer.

Note:
This is under the assumption that if mafia attacked What , while What attacked the bomb, only bomb and What would die, not the mafia attacker.

There are cases where the bomb would literally take out everyone : itself, its attacker the SK, and its attacker's attackers etc, simply for all being at the same location.

I am going to ask Blade about this ruling just to be on the safe side, but the latter is usually observed more towards EpicMafia rather than mafiascum.

So again, highly more likely that mafia at least ATTEMPTED to kill someone, rather than holding their dicks around and hoping for the best.

- - - Updated - - -

Cyber

Well shit, I was typing a post asking you to humour me and telling me what you got as a result, but I remembered that your action got blocked.

Maybe next time.

[Assassin]

to add on onto the Phil argument :
if anything, if there's a mafia, that WASN't roleblocked by nemesis (aka assassin), nor denied by a doctor or bodyguard or faith healers, or dodged by commuter or hider or vest or bulletproof or other crap,
then they would have to have attacked WHAT as the serial killer.

Note:
This is under the assumption that if mafia attacked What , while What attacked the bomb, only bomb and What would die, not the mafia attacker.

There are cases where the bomb would literally take out everyone : itself, its attacker the SK, and its attacker's attackers etc, simply for all being at the same location.

I am going to ask Blade about this ruling just to be on the safe side, but the latter is usually observed more towards EpicMafia rather than mafiascum.

So again, highly more likely that mafia at least ATTEMPTED to kill someone, rather than holding their dicks around and hoping for the best.

- - - Updated - - -



Well shit, I was typing a post asking you to humour me and telling me what you got as a result, but I remembered that your action got blocked.

Maybe next time.

Yeah it said your investigation has returned nadda results (obv paraphrasing so I don't get modkilled)

- - - Updated - - -

Also as a note, Nem I may have called you a bunch of shit like you do me always, but I NEVER voted for you, nor did my rb actions cause this shit.

[CYBER]

nor did my rb actions cause this shit.

wha? rephrase.