let go of that silly argument both of you.

What, when I first read the post you made, "arsonist must be an idiot". Look at who they targeted blah blah, i can see this happen from zambi/hippo?
I originally first thought you called out zambi that he's an idiot too because I tend to read fast and accidentally chain sentences (you've all seen my walls....).

So I can see where stars comes from, EVEN THO technically speaking, What's in the right that the two sentences are distinct and CAN be exclusive, and the first sentence doesn't have to be seen as a PREMISE, along with the second sentence, to the concluding third sentence.

When reading from a fast paced contextual point of view, I made the same mistake as stars, but when you cleared up that this is not what you meant, stars should just stfu and let it go because the structure of the sentence CAN support What's point of view.


SO in other words, both of you stfu about this zambi being an idiot vs not being an idiot.
Hell, I think zambi does have sound logical/sound moments in mafia games... But you're still an idiot regardless after your 2 minutes of fame.

Now.
What are we waiting on ? More info from Phil? or what? Stars? if you say you're a firefighter or wtvr, stop being a cunt with What and think about who might be the target of the next arson dousing attempt.
I still think hippo's a less risky lynch this day vs stars...
Even though stars HAS been screaming "im arson" from the beginning with his softclaiming of firefighter earlier with the "dont wry about arson"... while not really getting attacked by the arsonist.