B-Man

[acolyte_to_jippity]

maynard, im posting here with no intention of voting at this moment bcos im at work, jsut wanted to provide something very important :

steamr,
the second vote above was "legeby" (click on the votes)
how the fuck is legeby able to post a YES on a fucking ban request??...

ZERO ?...arent ban threads supposed to be ULA + clan only accessible for votes?

also, steamr, i am reopening the thread since u didnt receive another "yes" from another ula which would have given u the OK to ban, it was from legeby, the user that made this thread. 1- he is no ula lol... and 2- not to mention that his vote is biased considering he made the thread... (right or wrong , doesnt matter...)

re-opened until myself (after work) or another ula or clan sees this.

this is under temp ban sure, but it is also about rank manipulation which warrrants a perma, so if any ula who votes on this before me, make it clear whether you are moving for a perma or temp ban.
i will definitely see this at 6:30 pm at most, i will also support your perma ban request if rank manipulation is confirmed.
I'm tired of giving chances to people in zmod.

because this is in temp-ban requests, not user perma-ban requests.

[Steamer]

Fucking wrong place, though a ULA voted, anyway, user is unbanned until the next ULA votes (my apologies B-Man), also Ledgeby, any form of rank manipulation belongs in PERMANENT section, and you DO NOT vote on your own ban threads. Also, if this move's to permanent ban, follow with non-vote thread for record. I misread the section and thought it was already in that section.

You should get on the explanation and ensuing unban thread now B-Man.