good for some, not for others?

[acolyte_to_jippity]

See the point was missed, and as I expected, got the stupid response I said I was hoping not to get.

The point was, people that have played on the server for a while, long enough to know the rules, do they deserve a warning? Apparently they shouldn't because of that thread THAT WAS AN EXAMPLE ONLY, but yet there are so many others that just get warnings, and keep getting warnings. So like I said, discretion varies far too much from admin to admin.

So why do some players get warnings and not others? Even if they both played on the server for a long time and know the rules, and possibly are not liked or disliked in any amount, just regulars that play all the time. Bans are thrown around quite often by admins on Zmod btw to new players, even after a verbal warning they still get a ban when a kick or slay would suffice.


For the record, if I were to make a thread each time someone broke my cade, there would be at least 2-3 threads daily. Admins can't do a thing unless they witness it happening either.

tl;dr
the varience of discretion is TOO DAMN HIGH!!

i actually have stopped reading his threads. anyone else?

[Rezel]

Those "Stupid responses" were people replying to how you worded your post.. nothing more...

As for your questions they've already been answered time and time again - Admins have the right depending on if they are a regular or not, if its their first offense, and what actually happened. Thats what they should be deciding their ban on.

Secondly, your example was extremely offensive to me as you were obviously calling me out. There is a reason why we use hypothetical examples so they do not offend people. Maybe next time you make a post you should seriously think about the way you are stating people so that you actually make it sound like what you want and not something that angers, and or disappointing people.

Closed.

[maynard]

IBIS is not a democracy, it's a dictatorship.

[anex]

tl;dr
the varience of discretion is TOO DAMN HIGH!!