View Poll Results: what do you want 2 see happen with the nade rule?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • Keep the nade rule the same as it currently is

    6 16.22%
  • Revert back 2 the original way we had nades set up

    31 83.78%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Thread: Nade Rule [Vote]

  1. #11

    Default

    I think it's clear what the community wants.
    The Complete WCS Guide
    (Click on it)


    "They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I told them I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard."
    Our subject isn't cool, but he thinks it anyway - he may not have a clue, and he may not have style, but everything he lacks, well, he makes up in denial!
    Someone ever tries to kill you, you try to kill 'em right back.

  2. Default

    Keep it simple, keep it stupid.


    Tastes like your moms kisses.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erdenay View Post
    I think it's clear what the community wants.
    A figgy pudding and a walrus?

    While this is a trend, I do believe our WCS community is SLIGHTLY stronger than 15-20 members I will say, it's fairly doubtful this will be a "hot topic" in any case.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackmage View Post
    I vote for option two, but, as I don't recall how it was handled, how do we deal with the unpredictability of nades? Bouncing off/getting stuck in people/props, odd angles, frozen physics, ect. Do we just treat it as wards and figure if someone is using it, they're responsible for the risk of the radius being larger than they thought, or is there a little more leeway?

    Hyper: given the number of them you have, a usual strategy is to simply use them as weak wards and block paths and give an early warning system. Especially the smoke nades, you DON'T want to put those on a site, because people can use them as cover. While I agree it can be a strategy, I'd think using it on the sites would actually be worse for you, wouldn't it?
    Yeah i get it, i was just thinking of everything you just said basically. Think of the race itself, you are sky boxing, nades bounce, hit angles, hit people, you cant be accountable for stuff like this, its not like a ward were you know exactly were you are going to put it, its a thrown object. Now lets say we play dust2, and i go ct, and i throw a smoke by double doors right by the bomb sites doors, what will that be considered? its part of the bomb site.. will any smoke not be allowed into the bombsite area? There is just too many things that are very hard to control.

    I honestly don't ever see this being a problem in the first place so this rule vote seems kinda out of line, what we have like 1 or 2 hell hunters playing on a certain map at the most? Honestly i don't think i live long enough to spam the site. Look at it this way, if you see a site with poison smoke/fire, why not just go to a different site? Even if you are a t, the chances of you planting the bomb, and then having time to spam smokes/nades on it is very low.


    Even so, by the votes it is clear that im wrong and or over thinking this, and the members have spoken, the rule should be reverted.

  5. Default

    for real? you don't know what a bombsite is? here's a free tip... it's shown directly on the radar marked in yellow...

    Maynard - The WCS Guy

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    for real? you don't know what a bombsite is? here's a free tip... it's shown directly on the radar marked in yellow...
    Revert. As long as peopleDont confuse thise with throwing special nadesInto a crackhouse building or italy bottom floor etc...
    Started from bottom. Now we here. <IBIS>


    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO View Post
    Trying to hack in IBIS is like trying to kill someone in a police station, not the best idea...

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CYBER View Post
    Revert. As long as peopleDont confuse thise with throwing special nadesInto a crackhouse building or italy bottom floor etc...
    stop making posts on your phone, it makes me want 2 slap you.

    Maynard - The WCS Guy

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    stop making posts on your phone, it makes me want 2 slap you.
    you're telling me that's the only thing which makes you want to slap him?
    Quote Originally Posted by OMGBEARS
    I feel it is important for me to let you know how feeble your efforts to strike such feelings inside of me really are. I have the internal fortitude of a large animal, an elephant, for instance. Likewise, I'm the result of coitus between the devil and a pack mule made out of chainsaws, so I am extremely strong, and carry little care for others in this world. Trees also stand aside due to my chainsaw blood.
    Quote Originally Posted by ๖ReS View Post
    How am I supposed to tell you to fuck off without replying ?

  9. Default

    Revert

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by acolyte_to_jippity View Post
    you're telling me that's the only thing which makes you want to slap him?
    of course not!

    Maynard - The WCS Guy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •