Supernatural Mafia

[Sin]

Pasarelli is just saying the exact same thing I was yesterday. Policy Lynching is the same shit as No-Lynching except you're hurting the town even more by taking out one of our numbers and votes. SO WHAT if he isn't active? We can lynch him another day if need be, or he could just be mod-killed (preferred).

Aco, accusing me of playing scummy by asking everyone to give their NAMES, and be debunking it with the Bobby character, without him responding or contradicting me... kinda fishy, to be honest.

I'll stick to my vote since Nem though. Fucking scummy excuse he gave for trying to wagon votes against me.

SMH

[kionay]

Pasarelli is just saying the exact same thing I was yesterday. Policy Lynching is the same shit as No-Lynching except you're hurting the town even more by taking out one of our numbers and votes. SO WHAT if he isn't active? We can lynch him another day if need be, or he could just be mod-killed (preferred).

Aco, accusing me of playing scummy by asking everyone to give their NAMES, and be debunking it with the Bobby character, without him responding or contradicting me... kinda fishy, to be honest.

I'll stick to my vote since Nem though. Fucking scummy excuse he gave for trying to wagon votes against me.

SMH

i don't know that this policy lynch would be quite the same as a no-lynch since we have a bit of information here, he claimed a plain 'ol VT afterall

all i see is an inactive someone who says they're VT and What didn't seem too upset about the possibility of... adapting, and this lynch would remove someone we don't think is a power role, and doesn't seem to contribute much if at all

so it's either lynch nobody (seems to be a bad thing all around if i understand that right) lynch someone inactive who claims to be a nobody, removing a voter, but also removing someone that mafia probably wouldn't vote for anyway

i suppose later he could be of some use as a come from behind hammer when we need that extra vote? but i'm too new to this to say if this is significant at all

i'm not ready to vote yet myself, kinda on the fence about who to lynch, even though day 1 has gone on for quite a while :-/

[Sin]

Right and by lynching Stan we obtain NO NEW information going into Night 1, kionay, essentially it IS a "nolynch" because we'd find out that he was a VT in the first place, which we already know. Going for a lynch on someone playing scummy from the onset is ideal and the point to this game, isn't it?

I mean it is a gamble because, Nemesis, MAY just be playing scummy because he's a cumcovered vietnamese midget prostitute, but if we give him the benefit of the doubt EVERY game, just because that's how he is in general, he can use that against us.

Here's what we know:

- STAN is most likely a VT or just a townie with a minimal role like "Innocent Child".
- SIN is a "claimed" VT as Rufus, who has yet to be counter-claimed.
- NEMESIS who has been trying to start a bandwagon to lynch SIN since he claimed, then proceeded to vote STAN (VT) to hop on the train with everyone else going for a "policy lynch"

Most of our votes have been against another Townie. Where the fuck is your logic, people?

For the day going as long as it has, we will learn nothing from it. WE GET NOTHING. I'd rather gamble and lose than go for the safe option and lose anyway.

If we lynch STAN we guarantee (2) dead Townies going into Day 2. We lynch Nemesis, it could go either way but I just have a feeling he's mafia.

[kionay]

Right and by lynching Stan we obtain NO NEW information going into Night 1, kionay, essentially it IS a "nolynch" because we'd find out that he was a VT in the first place, which we already know. Going for a lynch on someone playing scummy from the onset is ideal and the point to this game, isn't it?

I mean it is a gamble because, Nemesis, MAY just be playing scummy because he's a cumcovered vietnamese midget prostitute, but if we give him the benefit of the doubt EVERY game, just because that's how he is in general, he can use that against us.

Here's what we know:

- STAN is most likely a VT or just a townie with a minimal role like "Innocent Child".
- SIN is a "claimed" VT as Rufus, who has yet to be counter-claimed.
- NEMESIS who has been trying to start a bandwagon to lynch SIN since he claimed, then proceeded to vote STAN (VT) to hop on the train with everyone else going for a "policy lynch"

Most of our votes have been against another Townie. Where the fuck is your logic, people?

For the day going as long as it has, we will learn nothing from it. WE GET NOTHING. I'd rather gamble and lose than go for the safe option and lose anyway.

If we lynch STAN we guarantee (2) dead Townies going into Day 2. We lynch Nemesis, it could go either way but I just have a feeling he's mafia.

all good points, except i don't agree that lynching Stan is the same as a nolynch since there is potential (be is small i suppose) that Stan could be that extra vote we need later, since he is VT and not.. nothing, then he has the potential to be worthwhile, which gives him some value that we lose by lynching him (where as nolynch is 100% guareteed no net loss or gain of value in VT/Mafia population)

his inactivity makes him of little value.. but that value is non zero, so i don't think we should lynch stan or sin, or nolynch, i agree with what you said about nemesis though

maybe if nem is VT and gets lynched then at least in future games he'll stop acting like how we'd expect mafia to act.... just maybe

[Blackmage]

First, as we found with Stan, be VERY careful when assuming things with What's words.

The death is most likely a demon, or at the very least scum. The suggestion of something else was in case we had something like Balthazar as a Vig. Or one of a variety of deities.

As I mentioned before. Sin's not dead. Not sure if he's telling the truth, leaving something out, or made a ballsy play claiming Rufus first. If it worked, it would be the perfect cover. I could convince myself either way currently, but I'm still leaning towards him being safe enough for now. I certainly hope he's clean, because he was actually trying to help the town, along with Pass, during the Stan voting.

With Brett, he's the same as any dead 3rd party. Be careful with what he said, while he wanted the mafia dead, he felt the same about the town.

Cyber, were these comments "And this means that it might not be a humans vs demons/angels setup, but could be a mix, just like the show does. Not that I can confirm this theory personally, but it should be mentioned, seeing how ppl assumed it was guards vs inmates in prisonbreak." really as innocent as you suggest, or not? I assume you wouldn't be trying to out yourself as a werewolf, and I make these kind of claims too, but felt like asking if you had anything to share.

On the vote for Stan, I'm looking at 4 people. Mikey, Jesus and Kion who were the morning voters who ended it and Scribble, who was aggressively pushing for an end to voting before Stan could fully claim. Voting went on for about 17 hours after his edit, and 14 hours after it was confirmed he was staying. Those final 3 votes took 30 minutes to happen, with the last vote before them occurring more than 12 hours prior. If we accept this as a policy lynch, ok, we made a bad play. OB was the first to vote Stan, and just waffled an hour prior, and Mikey's vote was somewhat safe, but both of them were suggesting they were just trying to end the day, which is why I included them.

On werewolves, the video recording kids you mentioned were turned by the late professor. So, while they were not often packs, we may have found a pack.

If you noticed I didn't mention Nem yet in this post, there's a reason for that. I'm just going to let someone else play with that particular can of worms first.

[CYBER]

Cyber, were these comments "And this means that it might not be a humans vs demons/angels setup, but could be a mix, just like the show does. Not that I can confirm this theory personally, but it should be mentioned, seeing how ppl assumed it was guards vs inmates in prisonbreak." really as innocent as you suggest, or not? I assume you wouldn't be trying to out yourself as a werewolf, and I make these kind of claims too, but felt like asking if you had anything to share.

figure'd you'd catch that hint. Was trying to let out that I was a human. in hopes that someone can subtly hint back if they ARE a demon AND town sided or angels and town sided.

But i let go of it after thinking that most likely any "angels" in the game will probably be just Cass, and if he's a doctor/healer, i wouldn't want them putting that info out there...


REMEMBER people, at this point there's still a very slim chance there could still be another werewolf, but for balancing issues i doubt it. But if that were the case, dont be idiots and start claiming shit left and right, bcos werewolves can know if u fake claimed or claimed right... and u'd be an easy target for wolves... not to mention the earlier comments about claiming VT roles only narrowing down the power players for mafia....



For the record, some of us could have possibly soft flavour claimed already. But now more than ever we need to keep things under wraps, and not claim unless in dire situations which will be observed for scummy bussing.