First thing's first. There's a TL;DR at the end.
You're 100% correct. I ignored that part. I agree. Don't lynch someone you trust. If you trust them, hunt elsewhere. My problem was in the premise. Just because you're willing to lynch a VT doesn't mean you trust them. My point was, the willingness to hit a VT has nothing to do with trusting their claim.
Also, as you say, minj hasn't claimed VT, so how am I pushing to have someone who doesn't fall into that category? 1+1 !=
i However, I will admit I would not have minded people voting for Minj, someone who had not claimed yet.
Try "Next time, find it yourself." The problem I had was that you said "do it" which involves an action. As I was asking your THOUGHTS, there was never any action for me to take. Second, see my response to your first post explaining why you're wrong.
You see, if you'd actually used your words to make it clear like that, we'd have skipped to me calling you slow for other reasons! Like I said, not minding lynching a VT doesn't mean you assume they're VT. You are ONLY assuming that they aren't a town PR. It is the same exact claim a scum would make. Saying A does not neccisarily mean B. It MAY, but it is not REQUIRED. Secondly, no one was trying to end the day, quickly or not. We had 4 votes on Minj. One was your RVS. One was mine, based upon him (probably accidentally) soft claiming NOT Seer/Faith Healer. No one has even asked anyone else to vote. Plus, we haven't even gotten to L-1 or gotten a claim from Minj, which means we WOULD need more votes, since he's come out and said he has NOT soft claimed.
I admitted I was wrong
here, but you said I was wrong about being wrong. I was more than willing to stop, you're the one who wouldn't let it go. You decided, rather than letting it go, to try to insult me again, lie about me, and say you meant what you said, which was not what you're saying you said.
Do I really need to go through every line of every post and say "I agree with this" or "this doesn't matter with your premise being wrong" when replying to you?
It is presented as a fact. As you said it does NOT have any errors in semantics, you're NOW lying, because it's NOT posed as an opinion, and therefore CAN be a lie.
Quite right. However, when someone is so bullheaded, and we are in RVS, it's as good of a lead as any.
My past games would disagree with you.
Wait, it's a scum play to make good plays? I'm rendered speechless. Also, why is it bad to push someone in the first day?
Why thank you.
Um, I don't see you saying I contradicted myself anywhere. I honestly DO NOT understand what you mean here.
Wat?
Don't leave me, I'm loney!
Oh, some other notes, Mikey says that my first post should be obvious, and still seems to believe it. Here's a fun fact for you all. In the first game Ibis did with Masons (Pokemon) Mikey outted his Mason buddy, before he'd even confirmed for
this reason! You see, it wasn't obvious for him after 4 games, and yet it seems he thinks it SHOULD be obvious for everyone.
Mikey, as much fun as it was to watch you, you've already convinced yourself you've "figured out" what I am, and I have my suspicions of what you are. As such, unless someone else wants us to continue this, I think we're done here. Much longer and I think I'd just get bored.
TL;DR Mikey used Mikey Language, I corrected him. He clarifies, I admit I was wrong. He answers a question of mine in Mikey Language, insults me and declares I wasn't wrong enough. Knowning exactly what he meant, I poke the bear and have some fun for the next few hours, mostly trying to teach him proper english. Eventually, after 3 attempts, he clarifies one of the piece of Mikey Langauge I didn't understand. He says he's done and I get bored, so I think this is "the end" on the game activity.
Originally Posted by DJ_MikeyRevile
Register To Reply
