because it's admin vs admin he doesn't really need a demo. all zero has 2 do is pull helmets admin logs, and if he was infact doing that and it's not allowed... well you guys get the rest... the proof is there, zero just needs 2 pull it up...
because it's admin vs admin he doesn't really need a demo. all zero has 2 do is pull helmets admin logs, and if he was infact doing that and it's not allowed... well you guys get the rest... the proof is there, zero just needs 2 pull it up...
Maynard - The WCS Guy
Lifting restrictions on a weapon just to pick it up then disabling it is, I would say, an abuse of admin powers. $11/month does not mean you can break the rules you agreed to follow and enforce. Senior admin doesn't play into it.
I would say this falls under section X of the server rules. Using the console to lift a ban, then re-instating the ban after you've purchased the weapon.
Bad form.
I suppose we'll have to see what ZERO says.
Yeah. I'm an admin. What of it?
true, but zero has a lot on his plate, and having everything lie upon HIM finding out is not really the best move... sure there is always THAT as a backup plan, but if he had a demo, zero wouldn't have to be envolved except for the final ruling, makes evreyone's life easier to have a demo, but yes, i agree with u , u dont NEED a demo, so everyone who would say "demo or didnt happen", its not one of those cases because its admin vs admin, just like u said.
/sigh
desert fortress, if you get to the secret platform, you get a awp, stop crying. not like just i had a awp, if someone was with me they got one too. /closethreadcrybaby