Admin Abuse

[Joker]

umm I would hate to be against the clan on this one, but in all honesty most of the gg admins play with the rule of if you slay for a tk during the warm up round we just "SLAY"them back and that's the end of it. It's just a pretty much spoken and used rule in gg. Now as for a ban for the same reason is a bit excessive even in my opinoin.
Also, when we go into the new maps we always say to the server that if anyone slay for warmup round I or who ever the admin is that's on the server at the time will slay them in return.


and also sometimes we just let it slide depending opon how we feel at the time, but we never ban for warmup round slay for tk punishment

[&&toasties]

umm I would hate to be against the clan on this one, but in all honesty most of the gg admins play with the rule of if you slay for a tk during the warm up round we just "SLAY"them back and that's the end of it. It's just a pretty much spoken and used rule in gg. Now as for a ban for the same reason is a bit excessive even in my opinoin.
Also, when we go into the new maps we always say to the server that if anyone slay for warmup round I or who ever the admin is that's on the server at the time will slay them in return.


and also sometimes we just let it slide depending opon how we feel at the time, but we never ban for warmup round slay for tk punishment

The ban wasn't just for the slay. It was also for the times he TK'd me and team attacked me. My irritation for this guy just boiled over. Like I said before, he does it again, his ban will be longer.

[H.Bitch]

The ban wasn't just for the slay. It was also for the times he TK'd me and team attacked me. My irritation for this guy just boiled over. Like I said before, he does it again, his ban will be longer.

Regardless of this, as this is a mute point in this thread, we're talking about justifying ban for nade-round slays. The majority disagree that it's ok to ban over something that stupid, because accidents can happen and even if it's done on purpose, it doesn't justify a ban. Slay them, burn them, or freeze them for a round to get the point across and then toss up an SM_csay giving everyone a refresher on how to not be a douche and not to nade-slay.

Even if he had been stepping on your toes, TKing and causing all these other problems, it still doesn't justify why you stated "Who slayed? Tell me their name and I'll ban them" That's the primary problem. Is it worth having your adminship being questioned? Hells no, it's a little conflict that we all could probably use some clarity on anyways. Point being, you stated this and there was 2 people, not just one in question for nade-slaying and both received the boot. So, regardless if you can justify the ban on one of them, pulling the wild-west card and laying down the law over something that isn't necessary should be reconsidered in the future.

[&&toasties]

Regardless of this, as this is a mute point in this thread, we're talking about justifying ban for nade-round slays. The majority disagree that it's ok to ban over something that stupid, because accidents can happen and even if it's done on purpose, it doesn't justify a ban. Slay them, burn them, or freeze them for a round to get the point across and then toss up an SM_csay giving everyone a refresher on how to not be a douche and not to nade-slay.

Even if he had been stepping on your toes, TKing and causing all these other problems, it still doesn't justify why you stated "Who slayed? Tell me their name and I'll ban them" That's the primary problem. Is it worth having your adminship being questioned? Hells no, it's a little conflict that we all could probably use some clarity on anyways. Point being, you stated this and there was 2 people, not just one in question for nade-slaying and both received the boot. So, regardless if you can justify the ban on one of them, pulling the wild-west card and laying down the law over something that isn't necessary should be reconsidered in the future.

You just won't get it will you? Like I said. You were only there for the ban. You weren't there previously, so please stop posting to try to make yourself seem like you know everything. If people can't have fun without ruining everyone elses, then they shouldn't be playing.

[maynard]

if you have nothing 2 do with this incident, don't post here.... 90% of you who have posted don't even understand wtf this thread is about... so as always, if you have nothing 2 do with the abuse claim, don't post.

[THE HOLY SH**T!]

Theirs nothing in the rules saying admins can slay people on nade round...till then admins should't do it.. if people dont wanna get slay either dont throw nades, or learn to throw them without killing your teamate...

if getitng nadded really butt hurts you to the point your slaying people...shouldn't have admin and or be playing.

[Steamer]

if you have nothing 2 do with this incident, don't post here.... 90% of you who have posted don't even understand wtf this thread is about... so as always, if you have nothing 2 do with the abuse claim, don't post.

^
This. (Yes that includes me also, but just making THIS point.)

[maynard]

5500 tick "give me the names of the people who slayed you and ill ban them!"
there's no rule stating you're allowed 2 ban people for that, and you were willing and did ban multiple people for something you didn't even witness... end result, abuse.

[maynard]

closed till zero reviews. will post my findings later this evening when I review the demo and yes i know ive said that a couple times already, been busy.