Admin Abuse

[H.Bitch]

The ban wasn't just for the slay. It was also for the times he TK'd me and team attacked me. My irritation for this guy just boiled over. Like I said before, he does it again, his ban will be longer.

Regardless of this, as this is a mute point in this thread, we're talking about justifying ban for nade-round slays. The majority disagree that it's ok to ban over something that stupid, because accidents can happen and even if it's done on purpose, it doesn't justify a ban. Slay them, burn them, or freeze them for a round to get the point across and then toss up an SM_csay giving everyone a refresher on how to not be a douche and not to nade-slay.

Even if he had been stepping on your toes, TKing and causing all these other problems, it still doesn't justify why you stated "Who slayed? Tell me their name and I'll ban them" That's the primary problem. Is it worth having your adminship being questioned? Hells no, it's a little conflict that we all could probably use some clarity on anyways. Point being, you stated this and there was 2 people, not just one in question for nade-slaying and both received the boot. So, regardless if you can justify the ban on one of them, pulling the wild-west card and laying down the law over something that isn't necessary should be reconsidered in the future.

[&&toasties]

Regardless of this, as this is a mute point in this thread, we're talking about justifying ban for nade-round slays. The majority disagree that it's ok to ban over something that stupid, because accidents can happen and even if it's done on purpose, it doesn't justify a ban. Slay them, burn them, or freeze them for a round to get the point across and then toss up an SM_csay giving everyone a refresher on how to not be a douche and not to nade-slay.

Even if he had been stepping on your toes, TKing and causing all these other problems, it still doesn't justify why you stated "Who slayed? Tell me their name and I'll ban them" That's the primary problem. Is it worth having your adminship being questioned? Hells no, it's a little conflict that we all could probably use some clarity on anyways. Point being, you stated this and there was 2 people, not just one in question for nade-slaying and both received the boot. So, regardless if you can justify the ban on one of them, pulling the wild-west card and laying down the law over something that isn't necessary should be reconsidered in the future.

You just won't get it will you? Like I said. You were only there for the ban. You weren't there previously, so please stop posting to try to make yourself seem like you know everything. If people can't have fun without ruining everyone elses, then they shouldn't be playing.