Rather then being pointlessly insulting, why not simply poke holes in the logic.
My logic being:
Day 1 policy lynch means no usable voting data. No voting data means investigators are ham-stringed and less likely to have usable data for day 2. Thus, night 1 is not being used efficiently.
Day 1 semi-random lynch gives decent data which investigators can use to zero in on a suspect. If they still miss their mark, even if a policy lynch takes place during day 2, they can still use the data from the previous day.
Which of the two seems preferable to you?
Again, let me know if I am misunderstanding how this works. I am a newbie after all.
- - - Updated - - -
*the previous day for night 2.






Register To Reply