cyber and i aren't altering any rules. we're operating off of precedent. ITB's perma ban on milky set this precedent, that admission of guilt is enough for a perma ban. no rule states that demos must be posted, it's traditional but some cases have extenuating circumstances and those need to be considered. also from zero's post on the links to demos page, "
These demos are acceptable as evidence for reporting admin abuse and hackers." the demos are acceptable, not mandatory. there is no rule being changed, no rule being ignored, no rule being created by any of this.
there's also this thread (
http://www.ibisgaming.com/forums/sho...light=tehfudge ) in which it seems to me the ban was made not after watching a demo (as no ULA posted) but from the admittance that he was bhop scripting. and that's not even walls, just a bhop script. fudge admitted to it, and maynard (another clan member) banned him. if the demo i provided was watched and that's why the user was banned, then this particular case can be ignored but it appears to me that maynard banned solely off the admittance of bhop scripting.
Originally Posted by brett friggin favre
Register To Reply
